Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111130
18 avril 2012
18 avril 2012
What steps were taken to find any eyewitnesses to the incident? 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198547
24 octobre 2019
24 octobre 2019
(b) On what legal and factual grounds was the decision to deport the applicant taken? 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11830
30 janvier 2018
30 janvier 2018
The campaign took the form of a series of advertisements showing models in designer wear with captions reading “Jesus, what trousers!”, “Dear Mary, what a dress!”
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-182525
26 mars 2018
26 mars 2018
(b) What is the reason for the absence of the applicant’s signature on that document? 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196782
19 septembre 2019
19 septembre 2019
What medical specialists examined them? Did the specialists have the required competence to assess his condition? What medical tests was the applicant’s son subjected to?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-250481
26 mai 2026
26 mai 2026
What was the legal basis for the seclusion measure in each case?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244671
22 juillet 2025
22 juillet 2025
b) What was the law applicable to the relevant form of deprivation of property?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-142795
1 avril 2014
1 avril 2014
The parties are requested to answer the following questions: (a) What were the dimensions of the dormitory where the applicant was held?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-191595
14 février 2019
14 février 2019
What parts of the period from 26 May 2005 to 14 September 2009 should be taken into account in the Court’s assessment of the length of proceedings (see, for example and mutatis mutandis ,
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-181755
22 février 2018
22 février 2018
What was the exact scope of these rights at the relevant stage of proceedings? What was the exact wording by which such information was conveyed to the applicant?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-249847
24 mars 2026
24 mars 2026
The parties are also invited to inform the Court if the proceedings before the Constitutional Court can be re-opened and, if so, in what situations and on what legal grounds.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-170106
1 décembre 2016
1 décembre 2016
What was the legal basis for his detention from 8 November to 27 December 2006? Were the extradition proceedings conducted with due diligence?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-127624
1 octobre 2013
1 octobre 2013
What I said to the investigating judge on 16 August 2005 had been what I had been told to say by the police officers in Veles.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0616DEC000252607
16 juin 2009
16 juin 2009
Because of the differences between what he had said in interview and what he said in evidence, his credibility was called into question.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14036
23 mars 2023
23 mars 2023
It had been a declaration of the applicant’s personal perception of what she had witnessed at the scene.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248749
22 janvier 2026
22 janvier 2026
What was the legal basis for the applicant’s removal to Syria on 13 October 2017? 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0921JUD000840007
21 septembre 2010
21 septembre 2010
to operate it, and what you wish to see.
Source officielleTRIBUNAL_UE
ECLI:EU:T:2018:134
13 mars 2018
13 mars 2018
#Марка на Европейския съюз — Производство по възражение — Заявка за фигуративна марка на Европейския съюз „Guidego what to do next“ — По-ранна словна марка на Европейския съюз „GUIDIGO“ — Относително основание
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229070
30 octobre 2023
30 octobre 2023
The record of the refusal did not state what documents were missing.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1124JUD003649317
24 novembre 2020
24 novembre 2020
Sub-heading: The AKP is counting votes Question: What interest does the AKP have in all this? What does it stand to gain if you leave the [negotiating] table?
Source officiellePage 8 sur 1002