On 9 March 2001 the Appeal Court decided that the case could not be decided on the basis of the existing materials.

In the case of Mogilat v.

    A hearing in the present case and the above-mentioned Maurice case took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 23   March 2005 (Rule 59 § 3).

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Due to the complexity of the case the police requested, and obtained, the assistance of court-appointed accounting experts in March 1987. The applicant was interrogated again on 15 July 1987.

    The applicant submitted that, under the domestic law, the first periodic review of the lawfulness of his detention should have been carried out before 1 March 1998, which was not done.

  In the case of Nježić and Štimac v.

       The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

The event had been organised in a period when marches involving large groups and targeting the Roma had taken place on a scale that could qualify as large scale, coordinated intimidation.

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.     Background The applicant is a retired construction engineer.

The enforcement of the final judgement in question has never been carried out.

sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 14 April 2025   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 8226/19 Shahane VARDANYAN against Armenia lodged on 16 January 2019 communicated on 27 March

The appeal was dismissed on 6 March 2002.

2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns the circumstances of the death of the applicant’s son, P.A., during his involuntary hospitalisation in a psychiatric ward ( Servizio psichiatrico di diagnosi

Thereafter the case was suspended again. This scenario apparently recurred in 2022, and on 23 March 2022 the investigator again decided to suspend the proceedings on the same grounds as before.

On 18 March 2021 the plenary dismissed, by thirteen votes to six, the extraordinary appeal, holding that the applicant and the deceased had a feud as a result of the altercation in the bar.

On 26 November 2015, armed police officers of the Ministry of Internal Affairs carried out an operation in the Nardaran settlement of Baku and arrested a number of members of the MB.

    The applicant in the first case, Mr Aleksejs Šaripovs, is a permanently resident non-citizen of Latvia, who was born in 1967 and lives in Riga. 2.

On 1 July 2021 the Court (Fourth Section) sitting as a Committee, delivered a decision in a group of cases, which included the current application (see Oprea and Fotache v. Romania (dec.)