The applicants were questioned, and they reiterated their complaints regarding ill-treatment by the police.

ruling, the first and second applicants having failed to submit the requisite grounds for their appeals, even though they had been given extra time to remedy this shortcoming.

Since the woman’s brothers had not approved of him, they had kept their relationship secret.

In the present case the factual findings of the courts in this respect did not differ:   the Regional Court had concluded that there were sufficient grounds for believing that, if extradited, the

They are currently in Sweden. They were represented before the Court by Ms N. Lindgren, a lawyer practising in Stockholm. The respondent Government were represented by their Agent, Mr   C.

For example, the postage for their application to the Court cost 5 euros (Exhibit no. 3 to their observations) which they would have had to pay even if they had appeared before the Court without legal

France, 45728/17] The applicants were born as a result of artificial insemination using donor sperm. When they reached adulthood their parents told them how they had been conceived.

They opposed the application for an extension of the operating licence because of the risks which they maintained such an extension entailed, to their rights to life, physical integrity and property.

Besides the general material conditions, they also complained about the length of their confinement, the alleged deterioration of their mental health and the lack of food provided to the first applicant

  In this way, the two participants were able to pass their examination and receive the necessary certificate.

    The applicants maintained their complaints and argued that the witnesses’ statements were the only direct evidence incriminating them.

    At both venues the police made several warnings informing the demonstrators of the unlawful nature of their presence in a public place and required them to cease their unlawful activities

    In their appeals, the applicants mainly submitted that an attachment order could not have been made in respect of their bank accounts within the meaning of Article 248 of the CCrP since they

the ground that they were unable to prove the veracity of their accusations. 14.

In those circumstances, they should have lodged their applications within six months of the end of the situation they complained about, that is, the period of their detention in the remand prison or the

According to the applicants, the circumstances obtaining at the time they made their investments gave them legitimate reason to believe that they would be able to continue the exploitation of the gravel

It was a decision of the Thai authorities, in the exercise of their sovereignty, whether they merely asked the applicant to leave the country after the cancellation of his passport, which had rendered

from the restored owners under section 1 of the Act but there is no reported case-law confirming this possibility.

They further complained of the treatment inflicted on them in the night of 3 to 4 October 2002. Their lawyers also asserted that Mr Aziev had died while being extradited.