X-ray computed tomography scan (CT scan) of the head as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) had been carried out. 9.

and the construction work carried out by the A. company in the area had caused material damage to his house. 12.

    The circumstances of the case 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

Both the spent bullet cases and the fingerprints were sent for forensic examinations. It was established on 23 March 2006 that the fingerprints belonged to S.A.

In the case of Meidl v.

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

In the case of Chukayev v.

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.

In the case of Arskaya v. Ukraine, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mark Villiger, President,   Angelika Nußberger,   Boštjan M.

in case no.

In the case of Turluyeva and Khamidova v.

In the case of Leas v.

In addition, the applicant’s granddaughter’s death had been caused by lung and brain hypoxia. 18.     On 27 March 2002, the Iaşi Forensics Institute produced a forensic necropsy report.

In the case of Fazliyski v.

  The Applicant further considered that the transfer of his case from Hamburg to Berlin, and subsequently from Berlin to North Rhine-Westphalia, had caused a delay of 2 years in the investigation.

  On 29 March 1990 the case was transferred to the Nitra District Court.

    The circumstances of the case 1.

In the case of Tumėnienė v.

  In the case of Taraneks v.