CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

29 469 résultats pour « Becam »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0416JUD000888918

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2024

16 avril 2024

Following a control by the electric energy supplier, carried out on 20 July 2012, the applicant company became aware that the measuring device installed by the electric energy supplier at its premises

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0201JUD003231805

Admin. suprême

1 février 2011

1 février 2011

The applicant did not appeal against an administrative decision of 15 April 1998 confirming this measure, which thus became final on 18 May 1999. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1210JUD001078715

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2024

10 décembre 2024

This judgment was delivered on 7 July 2004 and it follows from the case file that no appeal was lodged against it, thus it became irrevocable.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0117DEC002267193

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 1997

17 janvier 1997

       A second suspension was introduced by Legislative Decree No. 708 of 29 October 1986, which became Law No. 899 of 23 December 1986.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0531JUD003858197

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2005

31 mai 2005

The case became pending before the Court of Appeal in April 1999.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1108JUD004066398

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2005

8 novembre 2005

The judgment of the Arbitration Court thus became final. 20.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0120JUD007986712

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2015

20 janvier 2015

    Some 9,000 judgments became final by 29 November 2005. The Republika Srpska was ordered to pay approximately BAM 140,000,000 in total plus default interest.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-171819

Admin. suprême

9 février 2017

9 février 2017

The applicants claim that they only became aware of such proceedings when their bank account was seized.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-161864

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2016

9 mars 2016

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Having regard to the applicant’s conviction, which became final with the decision of the Court of Cassation (dated 21 December 2011, no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202671

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2020

1 avril 2020

By a judgment which became final on 8 March 2019, the applicant was convicted of drug offences. He was sentenced to 4 years’ imprisonment, and expelled from Denmark with a life-long ban on returning.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0918DEC000321007

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2008

18 septembre 2008

As a result he became entitled to monthly and yearly disability and food allowances.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55712

Admin. suprême

9 juin 1999

9 juin 1999

Belgian francs), the claim to compensation for pecuniary damage being dismissed as not having been made out; - held that the Brussels Court of Appeal’s judgment of 7 November 1997, provided that it became

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-152948

Admin. suprême

16 février 2015

16 février 2015

It appears that in the denationalisation process, a certain V.W-M. became the owner of the building.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0123DEC005109822

Admin. suprême

23 janvier 2025

23 janvier 2025

case, the four-month time-limit for lodging an application with the Court runs from the date of service of the Constitutional Court decision rendered in those proceedings (that is, when the applicant became

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-178273

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2017

2 octobre 2017

After the decision concerning ownership became final, the first-instance court ordered the applicant to pay a certain sum to the Directorate for unlawful occupation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-163126

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2016

25 avril 2016

The decision was not appealed against and became final. On 23 October 2009 the district prosecutor discontinued the criminal investigation against the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2681

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2007

5 juin 2007

They did begin enforcement proceedings.The compensation was paid three years after the Court of Appeal's decision became final.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-226267

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2023

10 juillet 2023

the applicant’s placement in a specialised structure (Residence for Execution of Security Measures – “REMS”); the judge also revoked the precautionary detention with effect from the date when a place became

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601DEC000323904

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2006

1 juin 2006

The judgment was not appealed against and became final.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0614DEC000672116

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2022

14 juin 2022

Thus, as the applicant himself acknowledged, under domestic law, a decision becomes final ipso jure independently of the court stamping it with the certificate of finality. 10.

Source officielle

Page 83 sur 1474

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.