On 25 August 2016 the Government made a request to restore the application to the Court’s list of cases as in the course of the proceedings to enforce the Court’s decision, they were informed that the

  Furthermore, the Court was hesitant to find an analogy between applicants who live in a “frozen pension” country and British pensioners resident in countries outside the United Kingdom where up-rating

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Monnier-Besombes, - les conclusions de M. Phulpin, rapporteur public, - et les observations de Me Nicolas, représentant M.

Ont été entendus au cours de l’audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Cerf, première conseillère, - les conclusions de M.

  Whether the application was out of time Filing of appeal to the Court of Cassation against second judgment of the Indictment Division of the Court of Appeal: not a futile step and therefore had

of Honour of the CCE could be subject of examination by the Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia.

The applicant died in the course of the proceedings before the Court. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G.

The Court’s letter dated 14 March 2024, sent by registered post to the applicant’s address, returned undelivered. With this, the Court has no other possibility to reach the applicant.

  The expert informed the Court that he had first to comply with urgent orders from other courts.

On 26 June 2003 the first-instance court ordered the successors to pay the court’s fees. 10.   On 30 December 2003 the successors withdrew their appeal. 11.

by the Breda Regional Court.

  ARTICLE 13 OF THE CONVENTION In Brogan and Others , Court found that habeas corpus satisfied Article 5 § 4.

a message        On 31 January 1991 the Supreme Court partly upheld the applicant's plea of nullity and quashed the Regional Court's judgment insofar as it concerned the conviction

the Court.

Second, they submitted that the domestic courts’ interpretation of the offence of attempting to subvert the constitutional order, as well as of the provisions on complicity, ran counter to the essence

On 18 June 1992 the Leipzig Regional Court convicted the applicant, in particular, of two counts of rape together with deprivation of liberty, one count of attempted rape and several counts of theft of

    On 2 February 2015 the applicant’s mother challenged the Supreme Court’s judgment in the Constitutional Court by way of a complaint under Article 127 of the Constitution, alleging a violation

  The applicants sought to appeal against the High Court’s judgment to the Supreme Court.

which follows the case-law of the European Court while stressing at the same time the need for its jurisprudence to be followed by all domestic courts and prosecution offices;   Noting with interest

Ont été entendus, au cours de l’audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Cerf, - et les conclusions de M. Phulpin, rapporteur public. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.