CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
2ème CH - Section 1
5fd9760725a03c639bc74506
28 janvier 2020
* * * * * APRES DÉBATS à l'audience publique tenue le 22 Octobre 2019, devant : Philippe DARRACQ, magistrat chargé du rapport, assisté de Catherine SAYOUS, Greffière présente à
Page 83 sur 849
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1211JUD001523902
11 décembre 2008
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Art. 6-1;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0522JUD004403505
22 mai 2008
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1027JUD003032302
27 octobre 2009
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Art. 6-1;Non-pecuniary damage - award;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1282
Article 41: 2,000 EUR in respect of non-pecuniary damage. © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0122JUD000399103
22 janvier 2009
In addition, it claimed that the supplier’s failure to comply with its VAT reporting obligations in timely fashion could not be said to have directly caused it damage, and that the supplier had not enriched
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0707JUD001227803
7 juillet 2009
An illegal possessor in good faith shall have the right to keep those parts that have been added to improve the item concerned, provided these can be removed without causing damage to it.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0721JUD002105503
21 juillet 2009
Damage 77. The applicant claimed approximately 3,000,000 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0915JUD000609304
15 septembre 2009
Damage 64. The applicant claimed 5,642,159 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary damage and EUR 140,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 65.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0207JUD002660002
7 février 2008
Violation of Art. 5-1;Remainder inadmissible;Non-pecuniary damage - award;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0914JUD000906380
14 septembre 1987
PECUNIARY DAMAGE 10. Mr. and Mrs.
ECLI:CEDH:002-10232
28 août 1991
Portugal (just satisfaction) - 11296/84 Judgment 28.8.1991 Article 41 Costs and expenses Non-pecuniary damage Pecuniary damage Claim for just satisfaction by an applicant whom the Court had held to be
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0429JUD004899099
29 avril 2004
Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage 16. The applicant sought compensation for pecuniary damage in the sum of 130,983 US dollars (USD).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0920JUD004471398
20 septembre 2005
Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage 18. The applicants sought compensation for pecuniary damage in the global sum of TRL 31,685,716,000 (EUR 16,843).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0215JUD005874200
15 février 2005
Violation of P1-1;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122JUD004813207
22 novembre 2011
Lastly, the Government argued that the applicant had failed to exhaust domestic remedies, namely to file a claim for damages against the lawyer or his law firm or insurer.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD002089903
20 décembre 2011
Pecuniary damage 63.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0422JUD002632103
22 avril 2010
Damage 43. The applicant claimed 350,000 euros (EUR) and 1/13 cents in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage. 44.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0527JUD002595203
27 mai 2010
Damage and costs and expenses 25.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0601JUD002882304
1 juin 2010
Damage 59.