Me Morgane DELANNOY, avocat au barreau de LILLE DEFENDERESSE : Association [6] [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] représentée par Me Delphine RICARD, avocat au barreau de PARIS substitué par Me Sophie GABARON

Ont été entendus au cours de l’audience publique : - le rapport de Mme E..., - et les observations de Me Galinon, substituant Me Bachelet, représentant M. B.... Considérant ce qui suit : M.

Association LA SANTE C'EST LE BONHEUR [Adresse 2] [Localité 3] représentée par Me Delphine RICARD de l'AARPI VATIER & ASSOCIES, avocat au barreau de PARIS, vestiaire : P0082 substituée par Me Sophie GABARON

Diard, rapporteur public, - et les observations de Me Galinon, représentant M. D et Mme F. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. Mme F, ressortissante géorgienne née le 3 mars 1983, et M.

Romain Roussel Cera, rapporteur public, - et les observations de Me Galipon, représentant la société Enertrag Poitou Charentes V. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

The last-mentioned decision of the Donetsk garrison military prosecutor, of 8   April 2020, contained the following criticism of the investigation: “... the pre-trial investigation has been incomplete

;   28931/18 21/05/2018 Marat Rafikovich DINDAROV 1978     Detention in a metal cage during the hearings held by the Privolzhskiy Circuit Military Court on the premises of the Kazan Garrison

event of impossibility to terminate the proceedings this term shall be extended by up to three months by the district, city, military prosecutor of the army, fleet, military districts (commands), garrisons

Elite 5 Soccer occupait des terrains [Adresse 6] et [Adresse 7] à [Localité 1] sur lesquels elle avait réalisé des installations sportives légères (gazon synthétique, cages, bâtiment précaire pour terrain

    Investigation by the Hadrut Garrison Military Prosecutor’s Office of Nagorno Karabakh 1.     Preliminary medical conclusions and institution of criminal proceedings 18.

    On 6 December 2013 the Grozny Military Garrison Court examined and dismissed the appeal.

    The applicants appealed against the refusal to the Nalchik Garrison Military Court.

    In the course of the investigation M.A. identified and showed to the investigating officers the area inside the post occupied by military units of the Khankala garrison where he had been

you to freedom, to death in these mountains, in this sacred spring with death we march, freedom is blessed with death, I invite you to die; – time is wounded like the beat of a heart. … [Exile] … Garrisons

    In the meantime, on 7 July 2011 the Third Garrison Investigation Department of the Investigative Service of the Ministry of Defence of Armenia (Martakert, Nagorno-Karabakh) took the decision

    On 7 December 2004 the investigator instructed the Moscow city military prosecutor and the military prosecutor of Podolsk garrison to seize the documents.

    On 21 April 2004 the Military Court of the Moscow Garrison confirmed the decision of 22 July 2002.

    On 24 November 2000 the Military Prosecutor of the Ivano-Frankovsk Garrison informed the applicant that the case had been assigned to another investigator and that his request for victim

    On 9 March 2006 the Military Court of the Pushkin Garrison annulled the decision of 23 November 2005 and upheld the applicant’s right to the remaining 39 working days of his three months’