CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0305DEC003042316
5 mars 2019
It was established that B.S., the original owner of the flat, had died intestate and without heirs and that the documents submitted to the authorities to have V.S. recognised as B.S.’s heir had been forged
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0828JUD000027815
28 août 2025
  During the investigation the witness testified that he had seen the applicant assaulting the victim, who later died as a result of serious bodily injury.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-119444
10 avril 2013
According to an extract from the medical records, the child died due to a sepsis caused by meningitis.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0914DEC003065105
14 septembre 2006
In the present case Mr Dmitriy Kholodov had died before the application was introduced.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0113DEC001543589
13 janvier 1992
  He died on 4 August 1986.   On 10 August 1986, the applicant was arrested and subsequently charged with murder.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0705DEC006261900
5 juillet 2005
He further alleged that once when he was in the teachers’ room a colleague had asked him what the status of the PKK militants who died was and that he had replied that none of the PKK militants who died
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0607DEC004647799
7 juin 2001
As Christopher Edwards died in prison, the facts relative to this element were only likely to be elucidated by evidence from prison officers or other prisoners.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1730
27 janvier 2009
The Court found, however, that since K. had died only a few days after the rape and before any charges had been brought against the applicant, the authorities could not be held responsible for failing
ECLI:CEDH:002-1639
30 mars 2009
The applicant died in July 2008. The applicant had complained to the Court under Article 5 § 1 (a) that his continued detention had been arbitrary.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-56096
24 juin 2002
of Protocol No. 11, declared admissible the complaint concerning the fact that the applicants, parents and brother of a haemophiliac infected with HIV following blood transfusions and who has since died
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1951158-2050330
16 mars 2007
  Ms Siałkowska’s application concerns proceedings in which she claimed a widow’s pension, her ex-husband having died in September 2002.
ECLI:CEDH:002-3739
13 septembre 2005
The fact that, hypothetically, the marriage could take place if both their former spouses died, did not remove that impairment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1104DEC003695102
4 novembre 2003
The applicant’s wife died on 4 November 1974. The applicant completed an application for widows’ benefits on 10 February 2002. On 18 February 2002 the application was refused.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0308DEC004029404
8 mars 2011
The applicant having died on 16   July 2009, his widow, Ms Natalya Vasilyevna Trotsko, expressed the wish to pursue the application.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1663209-1746360
5 mai 2006
He died in 2000.   On 28 June 1994 the applicant, then a police officer, was charged with accepting bribes. The proceedings were discontinued in 2000 given the applicant’s death.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927DEC002020106
27 septembre 2011
The first applicant died on 13 October 2007, in the course of the proceedings before the Court.
ECLI:CEDH:001-114368
8 octobre 2012
On 24 April 2008 the applicant’s mother and stepfather, an elderly couple, died in their flat as a result of gas poisoning.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0601DEC001495112
1 juin 2017
2016 the Government made a request to restore the application to the Court’s list of cases as in the course of the proceedings to enforce the Court’s decision, they were informed that the applicant had died
ECLI:CEDH:001-145281
2 juin 2014
The applicant’s husband died on 15 April 1996. On 9 June 2006 the applicant lodged a request to purchase the flat she occupied with the Ministry of defence.
ECLI:CEDH:002-7551
21 mai 2013
bring action for damages in administrative courts while case against alleged defendant was still pending before the criminal courts: inadmissible   Facts – A member of the three applicants’ family died
Page 84 sur 390
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.