CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

10 526 résultats pour « Bessala »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0125DEC003260296

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2000

25 janvier 2000

    On 26 April 1990 the trustee in the bankruptcy proceedings initiated civil proceedings against the State claiming compensation on behalf of the applicant company for the actions of the police

Page 86 sur 527

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0914DEC002038802

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2004

14 septembre 2004

    the refusal of the Court of Appeal to hear G. deprived him of a right to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf (Article 6 § 3(d) of the Convention).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113054

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2010

10 mai 2010

expressly waived such immunity in a particular case; (b) in the case of a civil action brought by a third party for damage resulting from an accident caused by a motor vehicle belonging to, or operated on behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-157731

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2015

11 septembre 2015

    On 22 December 2011 one of the applicant’s representatives lodged a petition with the Ninth Division of the Istanbul Assize Court on behalf of two other persons and requested, inter alia

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0326DEC003704316

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2019

26 mars 2019

On 17 October 2014 the application for return was lodged, on behalf of the father, with the Bucharest County Court. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0123JUD007252017

Admin. suprême

23 janvier 2025

23 janvier 2025

The applicant disagreed, noting that the Commissioner lodged a cassation appeal on his behalf alleging a serious breach of the applicant’s rights caused by the fact that the Court of Appeal had held an

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-222972

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 2023

9 janvier 2023

On 21 May 2019 the Oradea Court of Appeal found that in criminal proceedings, the Public Prosecutor indeed acted on behalf of the State, but an acquittal in itself could not be regarded as proof that the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1109JUD001737820

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2023

9 novembre 2023

He had two expert reports produced on his behalf, which concluded that his state of health was incompatible with detention and reported significant delays in the provision of a CPAP machine (a ventilator

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-114043

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2012

26 septembre 2012

    Proceedings concerning visitation rights On an unspecified date the first applicant brought an action on her behalf and on behalf of the other applicants asking the court to grant them visitation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0507DEC003701615

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2019

7 mai 2019

    Nevertheless, the applicant succeeded in having the Prosecutor General exercise his discretionary power to challenge the judgment on the applicants’ behalf in the Supreme Court by way of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1017JUD002569014

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2024

17 octobre 2024

offered to make the payments not as compensation for expropriation, but on the basis of contracts of sale to be entered into by the applicants and an individual, Z.I., who was apparently acting on behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0907JUD005391111

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2017

7 septembre 2017

Nevertheless, the company had not ceased to exist as a legal person and the decision-making bodies of a company in liquidation continue to exist and may act on its behalf in certain limited circumstances

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-167689

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2016

20 septembre 2016

On 28 December 2011 and 6 February 2012 respectively Ms Hurkovska appealed on behalf of the December and January Groups of applicants.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1027REP002729995

Admin. suprême

27 octobre 1998

27 octobre 1998

s behalf for settlement on the basis of her marriage on 11 December 1992 to the first applicant, who was claimed to be a British citizen.   9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1107DEC003741197

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2000

7 novembre 2000

The applicants have introduced their application on behalf of their deceased husbands and on their own and their children’s behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0628DEC000126202

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2005

28 juin 2005

On 27 April 1995 the Samandağ Municipality, acting on behalf of the Treasury, requested the Samandağ Court of First Instance in Civil Matters to determine whether the applicants' plot of land was located

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0712JUD005940300

Admin. suprême

12 juillet 2005

12 juillet 2005

    Subsequently, on the applicant’s behalf, his trade union, the Hotel and Restaurant Workers’ Union, instituted proceedings against Air Inn before the Labour Court claiming that the dismissal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0305REP001981992

Admin. suprême

5 mars 1996

5 mars 1996

        On behalf of the Government            On behalf of the applicant         (signed)

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0702DEC002471294

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 1997

2 juillet 1997

        The applicant further complains that the Ministry of Justice dismissed his request to lodge an extraordinary appeal on his behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0903DEC001755011

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2019

3 septembre 2019

On 28   October 2013 the second applicant lodged a request to pursue the application before the Court on the first applicant’s behalf.

Source officielle