By letter dated 31 July 2015, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his declaration had expired and that no extension of time had been requested.

By letter dated 3 September 2015, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the Registry had received no comments on the Government’s proposal for a friendly settlement within the period

In the absence of a reply, on 3 September 2012 the Registry warned the applicant, with a letter sent by registered mail, that the time-limit to reply to the Government’s observations had already expired

The criminal proceedings were still pending when the application was lodged with the Court By letters dated, 21 October 2009, 19 October 2010 (sent by registered post) and 7 November 2013 (sent by registered

The letter was sent to the correspondence address designated by the applicant, but no response was received.

On 28 July 2016 the Registry sent a letter to the applicant requesting him to submit his claims for just satisfaction. No reply was received to this letter.

On 21 September 2011 the Kuznetsovskyy Court sent a letter informing the Zhytomyr Administrative Court of Appeal (“the Court of Appeal”) and the parties about the transfer of the case to the appellate

On 12 July 2019 the Registry sent a letter to the applicant requesting her to appoint a representative. No reply was received to this letter.

On 12 April 2019 the Registry sent a letter to the applicant requesting him to appoint a representative. No reply was received to this letter.

On 10 January 2019 the Registry sent to the applicant’s representative, through the Court’s Electronic Communications Service (eComms), a letter inviting him to inform the Court as to whether the applicant

By letter dated 1 March 2013, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for the designation of the advocate had expired on 21 November 2012 and that no extension of time

By letter dated 21 March 2017 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant’s lawyer, who was requested to submit observations in reply together with any claims for just satisfaction by 2 May

    By letter dated 23 May 2018, sent by registered post, the applicant was invited to inform the Court about any developments of the proceedings at the domestic level.

    By letter dated 23 May 2018, sent by registered post, the applicant was invited to inform the Court about any developments of the proceedings at the domestic level since his last correspondence

    By letter dated 23 May 2018, sent by registered post, the applicant was invited to inform the Court about any developments of the proceedings at the domestic level since his last correspondence

    By letter dated 23 May 2018, sent by registered post, the applicant was invited to inform the Court about any developments of the proceedings at the domestic level since his last correspondence

The Government’s submissions following the communication of the case were sent to the applicant with a request to comment.

By letter dated 3 June 2016, sent by registered post to the applicant’s representative, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of the applicant’s observations had expired on

    By a letter of 31 January 2017, sent by registered post, the applicant was invited to inform the Court about any developments in the proceedings at domestic level and to confirm that she

This letter was sent to the applicant’s home address and has not returned to the Court. However, no response has been received.