The applicants complained under Article 6 of the Convention that they had been unable to plead their case effectively, that there had been no public and adversarial hearing and that the penalty

They further maintained under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention that there had been no effective domestic remedy to challenge the lawfulness of their detention.

When he saw this, he [I.M.] asked the children why they did not give the ball back to Dalibor, and Dalibor started to shout and wave his hands. The children then threw the ball and he took it.

Since April 2006 they had been threatened by Hutus to leave their property as the Hutus considered that the land belonged to them.

They also made a number of complaints regarding alleged unlawful acts against them by the local authorities aimed at removing them from their village. 4.

In support of their application they produced their request for repatriation of 31 October 2018 and the requests submitted to the French President a few months earlier by their counsel, on behalf of several

Since then the applicants have alleged that the stigma attaching to their reputation has led to other businesses refusing to trade with them e.g. providing two letters referring to the appearance of the

    In the course of the retrial the trial court repeatedly summoned the victims and ordered the police to escort them to the court hearings but they failed to appear for unknown reasons.

The security forces had then proceeded to set their houses on fire.

  These complaints relate in particular to their being required to assemble in one room of their home and the recording of personal details about them and the retention of those records.

down in the snow all night, beat and abused them and burned the house of Ömer Aslan.

their authors and the applicants and the fact that these declarations were made more than two years after the events. 77.

Accordingly, the Ministry reiterated the order for their immediate deportation. The applicants were not sent a copy of this letter, nor were they served with a deportation order. 20.

Third, in all three cases the domestic courts examined the weight, coherence and consistency of the victims’ statements and linked them to other available evidence, they examined the defence’s versions

Following their departure, the BCEA’s employees destroyed these flats and the roof of the building.

Then they forced Mr   Aslan Abubakarov into one of the Ural lorries and drove him off in the direction of the Achkhoy-Martan FSB. 10.

they were not informed of the reasons for their arrest and had no effective access to the procedure to challenge the lawfulness of their arrest and detention.

notification, and requested them to hand over their then three-month-old baby.

They then took the applicant to a nearby village where they continued beating him up. Thereafter, their driver brought the applicant back to Stepanakert.