now included in the calculation of the length of pre-trial detention), others remained.

He remained in detention pending investigation and trial.

The time he had spent in pre-trial detention or custody both in Latvia and in the United States was counted as part of his sentence. His conviction was upheld on appeal.

He wished his second trial to be held in public, but the victim’s request for an in camera hearing was upheld.

During the trial, a witness testified that A.D. had regularly visited him in prison and had voiced her fear of testifying.

Relying particularly on M.’s pre-trial statement, on 18 January 2017 the Regional Court sentenced the applicant to six years of prison. His appeals were unsuccessful.

refusing to grant the applicant’s request for reopening, the Diyarbakır 4th   Assize Court held that issues giving rise to the Court’s finding of a violation could not be remedied through a new trial

It added that “in the event of any further extension [of the pre-trial detention], it will have to be explained why this assumption was incorrect”.

in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Prot. 7

    Pre-trial investigation 3.

Violation of Article 6+6-3-b - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-b - Preparation of defence;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Violation of

At the preparatory trial hearing ( pro forma zitting ) held before the Rotterdam Regional Court on 16 April 2020, the applicant requested to have his pre-trial detention either lifted or suspended.

Until 23 December 2014 the applicant’s pre-trial detention was based on the risk of absconding, interfering with the proceedings and reoffending.

On 23 August 2017 the applicant was placed under pre-trial detention within the context of a criminal investigation initiated against him and his co-accuseds.

Following several remittals, the second-instance court again remitted the case for a fresh examination before a newly composed panel of the trial court.

within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.

trial.

On 20 August 1993 the report of the trial judge on the trial was also filed pursuant to section 236A of the Criminal procedure (Scotland) Act 1974.