Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0316DEC000178915
16 mars 2021
16 mars 2021
By a decision of 1 February 2011, which became final on 2 March 2011, these proceedings were discontinued because the debt had been paid in full.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0214JUD002029507
14 février 2019
14 février 2019
On 14 January 2013 the criminal proceedings were terminated because of the lack of corpus delicti .
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186571
5 septembre 2018
5 septembre 2018
A.U. did not see how the applicant’s arrest had been completed or how he had been taken to the police car because that had been done by M.B.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0611DEC000196212
11 juin 2019
11 juin 2019
G.P. lodged an appeal against that decision belatedly, so the decision became final as early as on 17 August 2007. 14.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0522JUD005764600
22 mai 2007
22 mai 2007
His claim for widows' benefits was made on 22 December 1998 and was rejected on 23 February 1999 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows' benefits because he was not a woman.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0522JUD005837000
22 mai 2007
22 mai 2007
His second claim for widows' benefits was made on 11 May 2000 and was rejected on 24 May 2000 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows' benefits because he was not a woman.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-166726
23 août 2016
23 août 2016
The time-limit for an appeal expired and the Court of Appeal’s judgment became final on 17 October 2011. In March 2012 the defendants paid the judgment debt in full.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2396047-2593892
24 juin 2008
24 juin 2008
, and of Article 6 (right to a fair hearing) because of the excessive length of the proceedings before the domestic courts.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0311DEC001140904
11 mars 2008
11 mars 2008
A lawyer representing one of the other convicted persons submitted that the proceedings had been unfair because the victims of the crime had been questioned at the investigation stage by a court inferior
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0214DEC003548009
14 février 2012
14 février 2012
Subsequently, he had received threatening letters from these men who had considered him a traitor because his father had been Hutu (his mother was Tutsi) and his house had been attacked.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113085
12 novembre 2009
12 novembre 2009
On 8 January 2007 the Administrative Court, referring to its case-law in similar cases, dismissed the request for legal aid because of lack of prospect of success.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1209DEC000038522
9 décembre 2025
9 décembre 2025
The Court does not need to examine the objection of abuse because the application is in any event inadmissible for the following reasons. 11.
Source officielle2ème CHAMBRE CIVILE
64b0e7d1c42a2105dbc59b89
13 juillet 2023
13 juillet 2023
épouse [G] née le [Date naissance 1] 1956 à [Localité 7] de nationalité Française Profession : Retraité(e), demeurant [Adresse 4] Représentée par Me Dominique ASSIER de la SCP MONEGER-ASSIER-BELAUD
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-156662
7 juillet 2015
7 juillet 2015
The following day the district prosecutor rejected the applicant’s lawyer’s request, but the applicant did not appeal against it because she had already been released.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0206JUD006052500
6 février 2007
6 février 2007
His claim for widows’ benefits was then made on 1 September 2000 and was rejected on 8 September 2000 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows’ benefits because he was not a woman.
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Toulouse
ORTA_2204004_20220719
19 juillet 2022
19 juillet 2022
L'Etat versera à Me Belaid avocate de Mme C B et de M.
Source officielleJurid. Premier Président
6274bccf2799a9057d5dd15b
5 mai 2022
5 mai 2022
[K] a comparu en personne, assisté de son avocate, Maître Caroline BEAUD. M. [D] [K] et son conseil ont indiqué avoir eu connaissance de l'avis du collège du 4 mai 2022. M.
Source officielleciv1
613721c3cd580146773f6fda
18 novembre 1992
18 novembre 1992
décret du 14 juin 1938, dont le siège social est à Paris (17e), ..., en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 11 septembre 1990 par la cour d'appel de Rennes (7e Chambre), au profit : 1°) de la société Bégard
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1011DEC000435303
11 octobre 2005
11 octobre 2005
Institution no. 5 has no facilities for blood transfusion because it has no contract with the blood-transfusion service.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1002DEC005794210
2 octobre 2012
2 octobre 2012
They contended further that the application was manifestly ill ‑ founded because the applicant had pleaded guilty. 23.
Source officiellePage 89 sur 1597