They dismissed the medical documentation relating to the first applicant despite the fact that his father was present during the medical examination on 21 April 2017 and confirmed his identity, and this

Seeing that the applicants and their lawyers had not attended the hearing, the fact that they had been unable to take the steps indicated above could not be attributed to the authorities.

According to the applicant, she recognised those items by their colours, the way they were damaged and special features such as the stripe on the legs of the trousers, the shape of the heels on the shoes

  They indicated that in these circumstances they no longer sought to continue the application before the Commission.

They highlighted that the administrative offence records in their cases quoted their slogans in support of the rights of LGBT people and that the courts’ decisions referred to the applicants’ chanting

They married and had a child while the appeal proceedings were pending. In these circumstances there is no doubt that their relationship constituted family life within the meaning of Article 8.

    The Court notes at the outset that the applicants have not availed themselves of any domestic remedies in respect of their grievances as they considered that there was no effective domestic

station, held there for some thirty minutes and then taken back to the prison.

Moreover, there had been chaos every time the applicant had met with the children during the summer or when she had appeared, often unannounced, at their day care centre, leaving them upset and sad. 10

Having found out about this, the applicant went to the police station to inquire about the reasons for their visit.

the right to the issue of an employment permit, it followed that they too had a right to adjudication on their request for an employment permit.

    According to the applicants, on the same date the bodies were returned to them and they buried the remains. 26.

They pointed out that they had lived as a family in Bulgaria and that there was no doubt that the first applicant’s expulsion represented an interference with their right to family life.

According to the applicants, they stayed in the transit zone until 24 January 2019. They then left the reception centre for Germany where they applied for asylum on 15 February 2019. 8.

   At the hearing on 21 February 1989, the Government confirmed their submission made in their memorial inviting the Court "to hold that there has been no violation of the Convention in the present

In their voluminous statements of appeal they challenged, inter alia, the composition of the bench that had given the judgment.

(h)     if a person or a group resists the police and prevents them from carrying out their duties or if there is an attack against the police.”

They also requested that the neighbours be ordered to move the dog yard to the other side of their house.

  1 to the Convention about the non-enforcement of judgments in their favour. THE LAW A.