CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0923JUD002727395
23 septembre 1998
233, p. 16, § 34; and Calogero Diana v. Italy, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V, p. 1775, § 28). 37.
Page 9 sur 19
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0424JUD002581912
24 avril 2025
Rotari; the parties’ observations; the withdrawal from the case of Mrs Diana Sârcu, the judge elected in respect of the Republic of Moldova; the information given to the Moldovan Government that
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0517DEC003794813
17 mai 2022
xa0; 2022 as a Chamber composed of: Jon Fridrik Kjølbro, President, Egidijus Kūris, Branko Lubarda, Pauliine Koskelo, Gilberto Felici, Saadet Yüksel, Diana
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0220JUD000640621
20 février 2024
Article 41 § 2 provides that a punishment pursues the following aims: (1) to deter persons from committing criminal offences; (2) to punish a person who has committed a criminal offence;
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1014JUD003898521
14 octobre 2025
Bulgarie, La Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (troisième section), siégeant en un comité composé de : Peeter Roosma , président , Diana Kovatcheva, Canòlic Mingorance Cairat
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710JUD006475314
10 juillet 2025
The necessity of those limitations implies that the interference corresponds to a pressing social need and, in particular, that it is proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0912JUD006330717
12 septembre 2023
Norway, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Jovan Ilievski , President , Lorraine Schembri Orland, Diana Sârcu , judges , and Dorothee
18° chambre 1ère section
66fc3d912416523b9959b95e
1 octobre 2024
1ère section N° RG 15/05446 - N° Portalis 352J-W-B67-CFBPW COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL Madame Sophie GUILLARME, 1ère Vice-présidente adjointe, Monsieur Jean-Christophe DUTON, Vice-président, Madame Diana
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0617JUD001461519
17 juin 2021
In consequence the Court is not convinced that a legitimate aim can be said to have existed throughout that entire period. 35.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1126JUD004928219
26 novembre 2024
He further argued that the interference had not pursued any legitimate aim as the domestic courts had failed to adequately assess the impact of his actions on the rights of others or on public safety.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0227JUD007828014
27 février 2025
S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström , President , María Elósegui, Diana
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0321JUD005159019
21 mars 2023
Türkiye, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Jovan Ilievski, President , Lorraine Schembri Orland, Diana Sârcu, judges , and Dorothee
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1016JUD003362122
16 octobre 2025
Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Diana Kovatcheva , President , Canòlic Mingorance Cairat, Vasilka Sancin , judges ,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0918JUD005140121
18 septembre 2025
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0906JUD002815420
6 septembre 2022
en une Chambre composée de : Jon Fridrik Kjølbro , président, Carlo Ranzoni, Egidijus Kūris, Pauliine Koskelo, Jovan Ilievski, Saadet Yüksel, Diana
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0912JUD001578419
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0327JUD001611119
27 mars 2025
in that paragraph, and being “necessary in a democratic society” to achieve the aim or aims concerned (see Ovcharenko and Kolos v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0604JUD002879418
4 juin 2024
[Rather,] it concerns remarks about the court as an institution, with a view to achieving a legitimate aim in representing a client.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1017JUD001564618
17 octobre 2023
The Court is now called to examine whether the limitation pursued a legitimate aim and notes that it has been argued that the limitation pursued the aim of the good administration of justice
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0321JUD003814420
They further submitted that the interference had been proportionate to the aim pursued.