CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919DEC000269212
19 septembre 2017
} .s1D04044A { width:166.17pt; display:inline-block } .s5B081A9D { width:168.28pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 2692/12 Karlo GHVINIASHVILI against Georgia
Page 9 sur 451
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0130DEC001297714
30 janvier 2018
} .s9DEAFAE8 { width:10.01pt; display:inline-block } .s350C2B5F { width:158.27pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 12977/14 Kamala HUSEYNOVA against Azerbaijan
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0606DEC000578708
6 juin 2017
} .s37F28E47 { width:173.27pt; display:inline-block } .s5B081A9D { width:168.28pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 5787/08 Davit KHUTSIDZE against Georgia The
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0704DEC007856614
4 juillet 2017
} .sDED2D3D2 { width:174.6pt; display:inline-block } .s5B081A9D { width:168.28pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 78566/14 Sergiy Anatoliyovych LUTSENKO against
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0617DEC006266012
17 juin 2021
} .s21D34249 { width:170.29pt; display:inline-block } .s4AA02E54 { width:2.34pt; display:inline-block } .s365F7A77 { width:189.64pt; display:inline-block } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0603DEC001524304
3 juin 2008
} .sB2998F02 { width:154.72pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 15243
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1123DEC002144905
23 novembre 2023
} .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s8D17D8A5 { width:127.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0705DEC003270705
5 juillet 2011
} .s6011438D { width:181.97pt; display:inline-block } .s576DFC5F { width:15.93pt; display:inline-block } .sAA5C5B93 { width:187.63pt; display:inline-block } .s1CBBD6E0 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom
cr
6137269acd58014677426f18
23 mars 2005
nationale établie par la Cour de cassation, soit sur une liste dressée par la cour d'appel et ce n'est qu'à titre exceptionnel que l'expert est désigné en dehors de ces listes par une décision dûment
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0528JUD002720724
28 mai 2026
} .sE8F2C496 { width:5.11pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sAB798EC2 { width:3.78pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sF0C78780 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0219JUD001496789
19 février 1998
La liste des requérantes s'établit ainsi : M mes Anna Maria Guerra, Rosa Anna Lombardi, Grazia Santamaria, Addolorata Caterina Adabbo, Anna Maria Virgata, Antonetta Mancini, Michelina Berardinetti
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0627DEC004339809
27 juin 2017
} .s37F28E47 { width:173.27pt; display:inline-block } .s5B081A9D { width:168.28pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 43398/09 Mikheil KOTRIKADZE against Georgia
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0829DEC000229110
29 août 2017
} .s881A00A1 { width:164.51pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s2F7F4368 { width:167.84pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1003DEC000587816
3 octobre 2017
} .s7E088005 { width:177.86pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s2F7F4368 { width:167.84pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0404DEC004417316
4 avril 2024
} .s7FB0030E { width:111.07pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0613DEC000057615
13 juin 2017
} .s7E088005 { width:177.86pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s2F7F4368 { width:167.84pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0213DEC005228210
13 février 2018
} .s7EB976DF { width:159.74pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s58D00DC6 { width:160.74pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0627DEC001642112
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011DEC001128715
11 octobre 2016
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0109DEC007108212
9 janvier 2018
} .s316EC46D { width:184.96pt; display:inline-block } .s5B081A9D { width:168.28pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom