CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

7 351 résultats pour « Bonnard Vial »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0913DEC002934795

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2001

13 septembre 2001

Furthermore, in so far as she complains about insufficient access to the material presented to the Social Welfare and Health Board, she failed to appeal to the County Administrative Court against the Board

Page 9 sur 368

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0115DEC003040696

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 1998

15 janvier 1998

He was requested to submit his written observations within two weeks to the Board.         On 12 April 1994 the applicant received the above letter from the Board.

Source officielle
CC

civ1

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2021:C100322

Cassation

14 avril 2021

14 avril 2021

[I] était propriétaire à Lons et non dans celle lui appartenant, la cour d'appel, qui en a en dénaturé les termes clairs et précis, a violé le principe susvisé.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC004298709

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

    On 20 June 2012 the Police and Border Guard Board revoked the decision of 24 October 2007 revoking the applicant’s residence permit.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0108DEC001066405

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2008

8 janvier 2008

According to these provisions, by way of exception, the Board could grant a permission to lodge an application for residence permit with the Board if the person concerned was unable to apply for a residence

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-123836

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2013

10 juillet 2013

The Board requested the hospital where X had been born to present X’s medical record which it did.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0223DEC004591899

Admin. suprême

23 février 1999

23 février 1999

  The applicant’s appeal against the Immigration Board’s decision is still pending before the Aliens Appeals Board.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-174201

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2017

4 mai 2017

    The Board’s decision, in which the emergency decision had been upheld, was brought before the District Court, which upheld the Board’s decision on 26   March 2015. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5253

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2002

20 juin 2002

The decision by the airline’s dismissals board, against which no appeal lay, informed him that compensation would be paid.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1218JUD006819410

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2012

18 décembre 2012

A new application entails a full examination by the Migration Board of the reasons put forward by the alien and the Board’s decision may, if negative, be appealed against to the Migration Court and the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0701JUD005767818

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2021

1 juillet 2021

    A hearing before the Board took place at 19 and 20 September 2017. The Board’s bench was composed of a jurist qualified to act as a professional judge, a psychologist and a lay person.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0701DEC001390388

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 1992

1 juillet 1992

On 12 May 1986 the National Environment Protection Board (naturvårdsverket)   has in response hereto informed the county administrative boards concerned that it is important that the boards review

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0923JUD000719920

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2025

23 septembre 2025

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 26.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504DEC003412096

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2000

4 mai 2000

the matter to the National Church Board.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0909DEC003514397

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 1998

9 septembre 1998

    On 25 October 1991 the County Administrative Board revoked the Building Committee's decision. However, the Board did not base its decision on the merits of the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD004762806

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2009

13 janvier 2009

In his appeal, which became pending before the Accident Board on 26 July 2000, he requested compensation for total incapacity for work. On 28 May 2002 the Board held an oral hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1970:0724DEC000412569

Admin. suprême

24 juillet 1970

24 juillet 1970

Board in August 1962. While he was working at a generating station at B., he was elected shop-steward for the ... Trade Union.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0529DEC006819410

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2012

29 mai 2012

On 23 December 2008 the Migration Court upheld the Board’s decision. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0409DEC002919395

Admin. suprême

9 avril 1997

9 avril 1997

  Before the Parole Board's recommendation came before the Secretary of State the applicant in breach of prison rules returned late from his work placement in consequence of which the Parole Board's

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0701DEC003369202

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2003

1 juillet 2003

The applicant appealed against the decision to the Aliens Appeals Board ( Utlänningsnämnden -hereinafter the “Appeals Board”) which, on 21   May   2001, rejected the appeal on the same grounds

Source officielle