CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0913DEC002934795
13 septembre 2001
Furthermore, in so far as she complains about insufficient access to the material presented to the Social Welfare and Health Board, she failed to appeal to the County Administrative Court against the Board
Page 9 sur 368
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0115DEC003040696
15 janvier 1998
He was requested to submit his written observations within two weeks to the Board. On 12 April 1994 the applicant received the above letter from the Board.
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2021:C100322
14 avril 2021
[I] était propriétaire à Lons et non dans celle lui appartenant, la cour d'appel, qui en a en dénaturé les termes clairs et précis, a violé le principe susvisé.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC004298709
22 janvier 2013
On 20 June 2012 the Police and Border Guard Board revoked the decision of 24 October 2007 revoking the applicant’s residence permit.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0108DEC001066405
8 janvier 2008
According to these provisions, by way of exception, the Board could grant a permission to lodge an application for residence permit with the Board if the person concerned was unable to apply for a residence
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-123836
10 juillet 2013
The Board requested the hospital where X had been born to present X’s medical record which it did.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0223DEC004591899
23 février 1999
The applicant’s appeal against the Immigration Board’s decision is still pending before the Aliens Appeals Board.
ECLI:CEDH:001-174201
4 mai 2017
The Board’s decision, in which the emergency decision had been upheld, was brought before the District Court, which upheld the Board’s decision on 26 March 2015. 9.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5253
20 juin 2002
The decision by the airline’s dismissals board, against which no appeal lay, informed him that compensation would be paid.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1218JUD006819410
18 décembre 2012
A new application entails a full examination by the Migration Board of the reasons put forward by the alien and the Board’s decision may, if negative, be appealed against to the Migration Court and the
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0701JUD005767818
1 juillet 2021
A hearing before the Board took place at 19 and 20 September 2017. The Board’s bench was composed of a jurist qualified to act as a professional judge, a psychologist and a lay person.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0701DEC001390388
1 juillet 1992
On 12 May 1986 the National Environment Protection Board (naturvårdsverket) has in response hereto informed the county administrative boards concerned that it is important that the boards review
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0923JUD000719920
23 septembre 2025
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 26.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504DEC003412096
4 mai 2000
the matter to the National Church Board.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0909DEC003514397
9 septembre 1998
On 25 October 1991 the County Administrative Board revoked the Building Committee's decision. However, the Board did not base its decision on the merits of the case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD004762806
13 janvier 2009
In his appeal, which became pending before the Accident Board on 26 July 2000, he requested compensation for total incapacity for work. On 28 May 2002 the Board held an oral hearing.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1970:0724DEC000412569
24 juillet 1970
Board in August 1962. While he was working at a generating station at B., he was elected shop-steward for the ... Trade Union.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0529DEC006819410
29 mai 2012
On 23 December 2008 the Migration Court upheld the Board’s decision. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0409DEC002919395
9 avril 1997
Before the Parole Board's recommendation came before the Secretary of State the applicant in breach of prison rules returned late from his work placement in consequence of which the Parole Board's
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0701DEC003369202
1 juillet 2003
The applicant appealed against the decision to the Aliens Appeals Board ( Utlänningsnämnden -hereinafter the “Appeals Board”) which, on 21 May 2001, rejected the appeal on the same grounds