#xa0;   Having regard to Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;     Having regard to the application introduced on 1 November 1994 by Esa

32578/96 and 32579/96)     JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG     8 January 2004     FINAL     08/04/2004             This judgment will

An identical prohibition was contained in section 2(2) of the Enforcement of Sentences Act of 1969 (the “ESA”). 24.

Il est vrai que lorsque l'on essaie de vous joindre sur votre portable souvent vous ne répondez pas et rappelez dans les quelques minutes qui suivent.

It will examine the present case in the light of these principles. 24.

  It is presupposed that in performing their professional duties they will be guided by christian principles.

The public prosecutor then read out his observations on the merits of the case ( esas hakkında mütalaa ) to the trial court and recommended that the court find the applicant guilty as charged, but under

In this way, unless full redress is granted at an intermediate level, the complaint will come up through the chain of command to the Ministry of Defence and will be presented to the Army Board of the Defence

Millinger and Partners, lawyers in Essen.   1.

Esmer, a lawyer practising in Ankara (Turkey). The Government of Turkey (“the Government”) did not designate an Agent for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court. 3.

xa0; (Application no. 36110/97)     JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG     3 June 2004       FINAL     03/09/2004         This judgment will

#xa0; (Application no. 43379/02)       JUDGMENT       STRASBOURG   12 December 2006       FINAL     12/03/2007     This judgment will

possible d'occulter ou de disjoindre, le document est communiqué au demandeur après occultation ou disjonction de ces mentions. ".

Comment est-ce possible.

    At a hearing held on 31 August 2005, the public prosecutor read out his observations on the merits of the case ( esas hakkında mütalaa ) to the trial court and advised that the trial court

   The first applicant, Richard John Powell, is a director of a mining concern and lives with his family at Esher, Surrey, in a house which he bought in 1957.

The other four applicants each sought compensation under the same heads in the amount of ESP 25,000,000. 41.

  21986/93, ECHR 2000 ‑ VII), Esen v.   Turkey (no. 29484/95, 22 July 2003), Rivas v. France (no. 59584/00, 1 April 2004), Toteva v.

} .sE4B66E67 { width:21.73pt; display:inline-block }     AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF             Application No. 37312/97         by Yalçin ESEN