Further, the applicant's counsel confronted him with the applicant's defence, according to which the Sch. company had never been insolvent.

They further requested the Court to strike out the application in accordance with Article   37 of the Convention.

Née le 01 Janvier 1964 à DELPTA (LIBAN) ... 75016 PARIS Monsieur Erich Y...

SECTION DECISION Application no. 30096/12 Hajibaba RZAYEV against Azerbaijan The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 30   January 2018 as a Committee composed of:   Erik

Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols

DECISION Application no. 54643/19 Krzysztof Remigiusz CHMIELEWSKI against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 23   January 2025 as a Committee composed of:   Erik

Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols

    In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention or its Protocols, the Court, in accordance with

SECTION DECISION Application no. 13774/18 Adrian WINIARCZYK against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 23   September 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Erik

    In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention or its Protocols, the Court, in accordance with

FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 57227/19 Slavica VUČKO against Croatia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 9   September 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Erik

FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 62949/19 Tanja KAČKOV against Croatia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 9   December 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Erik

In the present case, the applicants’ representative failed to answer the Court’s requests to be informed whether he was still in contact with his clients.

In the present case, the applicants’ representative failed to answer the Court’s requests to be informed whether he was still in contact with his clients.

In the present case, the applicants’ representative failed to answer the Court’s requests to be informed whether she was still in contact with her clients.

  The applicant company   The case concerns an application brought by Bielectric srl, an Italian company with its registered office in Ospedaletto (province of Pisa).

They were revived in 1963 by the applicant’s mother and aunt and ended with a judgment of the Court of Cassation on 18 June 1996.

On 4 October 2004 the Tsentralnyy District Court of Chelyabinsk ordered the Town Council of Chelyabinsk to provide the applicant with a flat.

On 5   March 2010 the applicants filed an objection with the Regional Government against this decision. 16 .

It further concluded that the case had not been unduly delayed at first instance or on appeal and that it had been dealt with within a reasonable time. 6.