The continuous denial of access must therefore be regarded as an interference with her rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

Today most residents live in wooden huts, some of which have stonework or brick inside. Today some eighty people reside in the settlement.

This was separated from the living area by a brick partition of 1.5 in height. The dining table was situated at least two metres away from the toilet bowl.

It was separated from the living area by a brick partition of 1.3 or 2.5 metres in height. 44.     The Government affirmed that inmates were provided with food three times a day.

They had been taken blindfolded to a yellow brick building. Unidentified people had started stretching the applicant out, asking him about money and firearms.

    The toilet in each cell was separated from the living area by a 1.7 ‑ metre high brick wall and a door. The distance between the toilet and the dining table was 2 metres.

The lavatory pan was separated from the living area with a two-metre-high tile brick wall. Inmates could take a shower once a week for fifteen minutes. The applicant was provided with bedding.

The applicant submitted that the prison guard who monitored his cell was a woman, as at times he could hear her giving him orders via loudspeaker. 3.     The third applicant 21 .

The third applicant was the first applicant’s relative and had been living in the house with her family with the latter’s permission since October 1997. 9 .

In cells 3/11, 403 and 419 the toilet pan was separated from the living area by a brick partition 1.2   metres high. 55.

  The appalling sanitary condition of the cells had been aggravated by the arrangement of the lavatory, elevated by 0.7 meters above the floor level and separated on one side by a 1-meter-high brick

deal specifically with the respondents’ objection that the application was null and void, on the basis that it had not been signed by an advocate, as required by law and confirmed by the judgment in Bruce

The respondent Government accordingly appointed Peer Lorenzen, the judge elected in respect of Denmark, to sit in her place (Article 26 § 4 of the Convention and Rule 29 § 1). 8.

subjective            and uncertain terms - a vice particularly objectionable            where, as here

In cells nos. 122, 151, 153, 159 and 162 the toilet was completely isolated from the living area of the cell by a solid brick wall and a door. 2.

Moreover, in winter it was very cold because the heating, covered by a bricks layer, was not working properly. 37.     There was one 60-Watts electric bulb in the cell.

It was observed that the single floor house was of mud brick with a concrete flat roof. Roof columns, window and door frames were absent. The roof and walls were covered with soot indicating fire.

Article 19 “(1)     The administration of the remand centre allows the remanded person to have contact with his or her relatives or other persons, if the contact is authorised by the investigating

The lavatory was located at a considerable distance from the beds and the dining table and separated by a 1.5-m brick wall and a door. 2.     The description provided by the applicant 26.