arrêt du 10/01/2006, définitif le 10/04/2006 27504/95   Iłowiecki, arrêt du 04/10/01, définitif le 04/01/02 36258/97   J.G., arrêt du 06/04/2004, définitif le 06/07/2004 33492/96   Jabłoński

Indeed, that Article lays down not only the right to “trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial” but also provides that “release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial” (see Jabłoński

The Court further recalls that domestic remedies cannot be said to be exhausted when an appeal has been rejected or not allowed because of a procedural mistake by the appellant (see, Jabłoński v.

When deciding whether a person should be released or detained, the authorities are obliged to consider alternative measures for ensuring his appearance at trial (see Jabłonski v.

Turkey judgment of 8   June 1995, Series A no. 319-A, p. 18, § 49; and Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 334982/96, § 66, 21   December 2000). B.

Indeed, that Article lays down not only the right to “trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial” but also provides that “release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial” (see Jabłoński

Indeed, that Article lays down not only the right to “trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial” but also provides that “release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial” (see Jablonski

  26772/95, §   153, ECHR 2000 ‑ IV, and Jablonski v. Poland , no. 33492/96, §   80, 21   December 2000).

Lorsqu’elles décident si une personne doit être libérée ou détenue, elles doivent rechercher s’il n’y a pas d’autres mesures qui permettraient d’assurer sa comparution au procès ( Jablonski c.

Lorsqu’elles décident si une personne doit être libérée ou détenue, elles doivent rechercher s’il n’y a pas d’autres mesures qui permettraient d’assurer sa comparution au procès ( Jablonski c.

Slovénie , n o 29462/95, §§ 85-88, CEDH   2000 ‑ XII, Jablonski c. Pologne , n o 33492/96, § 94, 21 décembre 2000 et Khoudiakova , précité, §§ 99-100).

Indeed, that Article lays down not only the right to “trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial” but also provides that “release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial” (see Jablonski

Article lays down not only the right to “trial within a   reasonable time or release pending trial” but also provides that “release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial” (see Jabloński

  543/03, §   41, ECHR 2006-X; Jabłoński   v. Poland , no.   33492/96, §   83, 21 December 2000; and Neumeister v. Austria , 27 June 1968, §   4, Series A no. 8). 55.

.; Jabłoński   v. Poland , no.   33492/96, §   83, 21 December 2000; and Neumeister   v. Austria , judgment of 27 June 1968, Series   A no.   8, §   4).

Mirosłav Jabłoński v. Poland (no 33985/05), judgment of 8 July 2008. Panusz v. Poland (no 24322/02), judgment of 3 June 2008. Przepałkowski v. Poland (no 23759/02), judgment of 22 July 2008.

nationales, lorsqu’elles sont confrontées à la nécessité de prolonger une mesure de détention provisoire, de prendre en considération les mesures alternatives prévues par la législation nationale ( Jabłoński

’s complaints in the light of the criteria relating to the determination of the “reasonableness of the length of detention on remand” set out in the Convention organs’ case-law (see, for instance, Jabłoński

decision determining the lawfulness of detention in cases where a trial is pending, because the defendant should benefit fully from the principle of the presumption of innocence (see, for instance, Jabłoński