50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative offence proceedings

  Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019); the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the

Having learnt that another party activist had been committed to the police for displaying a totalitarian symbol, the applicant demonstrated in front of the police building, claiming the release of the

According to the applicant this order was not served on her, as she was not a party to the proceedings.

  Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence

When a transaction is declared null and void, each party is required to restore to the other party everything that he or she has received by means of that transaction (restitution).

  23885/94) brought by the Freedom and Democracy Party (ÖZDEP), a dissolved Turkish political party.   Summary of the facts     ÖZDEP was founded on 19 October 1992.

On 21 July 2017 the applicant lodged a claim for counter-enforcement against the respondent party, seeking reimbursement of the funds which he had paid for the legal costs following the decision of 7 November

  50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

The Central Election Commission subsequently declared two other candidates from the party list as elected to the Parliament.

    A court notification, addressed to a party, is to be sent to an address indicated by that party or his/her representative.

In these proceedings, the judge, acting as a prosecutor, had asked the Supreme Court for the non-inscription in the Registry of Political Parties of the political party SORTU, alleging that this party

fail to negotiate an agreement within four months after the date on which the party filed its proposal, the party may bring an action before the competent court under this Act.

REPUBLIQUE FRANCAISE Au nom du peuple français La cause a été entendue à l'audience publique du tribunal de commerce de Thonon les Bains tenue le 19 février 2025 et à laquelle siégeaient : Madame Pary

scheduled meetings specified in the decision dated 4 July 2012.”

    On 1 July 1988 the applicants were hit by a taxi driven by a Mr V.G.

affected by the refusal to register that party.

(local time) to deliver its Grand Chamber judgment in the case of Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France (application nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02).

In such circumstances, the Court concluded that there was no prosecuting party in the case.

In addition, a party named Communist Party registered a change in its name into Communist Party of Bulgaria in 2000 without any hindrance related to the similarity of the name with that of other parties