Law : Article 6 § 1 – The relevant period in assessing the length of the proceedings began when the applicant was interviewed in March 1993 and ended in March 1997, thus totalling a little over four years

On 9 March 2004 the District Court gave a separate decision on the complaints relating to the allegedly excessive length of the compensation proceedings.

On 9 March 2004 the District Court gave a separate decision on the complaints relating to the allegedly excessive length.

On 7 March 2002 the Maribor District Court upheld in part the objection. All parties appealed.

On 12 March 1999 a single judge at the Istanbul State Security Court ordered the applicant’s pre-trial detention.

TURKEY   Friday, 5 March 1999 at 9 a.m.

It referred the case to the Court on 17 March 1998.

  Complaints     The applicant complains of: inhuman and degrading treatment suffered while in detention contrary to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights; the length and

Since the death of Umberto II on 18 March 1983 the applicant has been the head of the House of Savoy.

European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the convention relating to the application lodged by Mr Giovanni Ventura against Italy (No. 7438/76);   Whereas on 26 March

    The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”).

In January 2002 he was released on bail but, failing to appear at a hearing in March 2004, the trial court ordered his detention. He was re-arrested and placed in custody on 31   March 2004.

On 9 March 2004 the District Court gave a separate decision on the complaints relating to the allegedly excessive length.

On 9 March 2004 the District Court gave a separate decision on the complaints relating to the allegedly excessive length of the proceedings.

  4860/09, §§   19-26, 26   March 2013 .

    Length of the proceedings 8.

Russia (dec.), no. 5727/04, 11 March 2010; Kuznetsova v. Russia (dec.), no. 9839/03, 24 May 2007; Antonov v. Russia (dec.), no. 38020/03, 3 November 2011; Markin v. Russia (dec.), no.

  5977/03, 24 March 2005).

THE LAW Relying on Article 6 of the Convention, the applicant complained about the length and the fairness of the proceedings.

The Court notes that the proceedings at issue began on 9 March 2005 and ended on 31 January 2011.