cour : Ordonnance rendu le 29 Septembre 2023 par le Tribunal de Commerce de NANTERRE N° RG : 2023R00735 Expéditions exécutoires Expéditions Copies délivrées le : 04.07.2024 à : Me Julien LAMPE

[Adresse 5] (Me BONAN) DÉBATS : A l'audience Publique du 17 septembre 2024 COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL Présidente : Madame Nathalie YON-BORRIONE, Vice-présidente Greffière : Madame Pauline ESPAZE A

against Serbia   The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 9   February 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Valeriu Griţco, President,   Branko Lubarda,   Pauliine

  The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 25   February 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Pere Pastor Vilanova, President,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,   Pauliine

Cet avis défavorable a été confirmé successivement par le directeur du laboratoire LaMé le 1er octobre 2023, puis par le directeur de l’école doctorale le 3 octobre 2023.

  The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 3   September 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Krzysztof Wojtyczek, President,   Pere Pastor Vilanova,   Pauliine

He submitted a letter from his lawyer, fee scales for individual applications before the Constitutional Court and records of his hospital visits. 18.

Dursun , a lawyer practising in Istanbul; the decision to give notice of the complaint concerning the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings on account of the applicant’s conviction on the basis of

Among the lay assessors who are not enforcement officers, there must always be at least one lawyer ( advokát ) and one person practising another legal profession.

Zeković, a lawyer practising in Belgrade. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

Zoran MARKOVIĆ against Serbia and 20 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 25   November 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Pauliine

Aleksić, a lawyer practising in Niš. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

Aleksić, a lawyer practising in Niš. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

Juhas Đurić, a lawyer practising in Subotica; the decision to give notice of the complaint concerning Article 5 § 4 of the Convention to the Serbian Government (“the Government”), represented by their

Aleksić, a lawyer practising in Niš. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

Čanković, lawyers practising in Zagreb. 2.     The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. 3.

Jean-Paul, contre l'arrêt de la cour d'appel de LYON, 4ème chambre, en date du 10 février 2000, qui, pour violences aggravées, l'a condamné à 6 mois d'emprisonnement avec sursis et 10 000 francs d'amende

Bukovac, a lawyer practising in Zagreb; the decision to give notice of the application to the Croatian Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, Ms Š.

    In March 2002 the applicant’s father, represented by a lawyer, brought a civil action against the State with the Zagreb Municipal Civil Court, seeking return of his vehicles.