Ibrahim Hafez Ibrahim Ed Degwej later christened Joseph Leopold invoked section   137 of the Criminal Code to challenge his prolonged and indefinite detention further to a removal order

E. also said that on the critical date the applicant had told him “Leave it, don’t go” (see paragraph 5 above). 9 .

On 21/08/2003 they went to the Sunzhenskiy district hospital where Ibragim IDIGOV was to have a wound bandaged. At about 2 p.m. two GAZEL-model minivans arrived at the hospital.

Türkiye 12/05/2020 İbrahim Halil ÖZBİLEN 1977 Eskişehir Turkish Burak ÇOLAK 98. 21076/20 Korkmaz v. Türkiye 12/05/2020 İbrahim KORKMAZ 1989 Eskişehir Turkish Burak ÇOLAK 99. 21203/20 Kazkondu v.

  Ibrahim Mohamed v. the Netherlands (no. 1872/04) Said Botan v. the Netherlands (no. 1869/04) The applicants, Abdullahi Ibrahim Mohamed and Sahra Said Botan, are Somali nationals who were born in

Pour dommage moral, elle alloue 35   000 EUR, chacun, aux mères d’Aslan Akhmadov, d’Islam Chagaïev, de Timour Khadjaïev et d’Abdoul-Nasser Zakaïev, à la tante de Saïd-Selim Kanaïev, aux pères d’Amir

Şeyh Mahmut, Simko, Şeyh Said, Seyit Rıza, Gazi Muhammed, Molla Mustafa Barzani [leaders historiques kurdes] (...) ont été pendus, fusillés, avaient dû s’exiler.

However, as could be seen from the Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC] judgment, followed by the Simeonovi v.

Türkïye Partisi – STP ) and the 13   Turkish nationals who founded the party, İlhami Alkan, Süleyman Zeyyat Baba, Murat Beşer, Sedat Cengiz, Nihat Çağlı, Mehmet Ali Doğan, Aydemir Güler, Kemal İbrahim

B..., représenté par Me Ibrahim, demande au tribunal : 1°) d’annuler la décision du 17 février 2023 par laquelle le directeur général de l’Office français de l’immigration et de l’intégration (OFII)

The applicant also is the grandmother of Ibragim Suleymanov, who was born in 1991 and a relative of Aslanbek Aydamirov, who was born in 1970. 7.

Türkiye 10/03/2022 Hacı İbrahim YILDIRIM 1991 Isparta Turkish Sema Nur YILDIRIM 116. 18468/22 Kara v. Türkiye 05/04/2022 Arif KARA 1980 Kütahya Turkish Satı YATIR 117. 18568/22 Atıcı v.

width:1.87pt; display:inline-block } .sD5C72CDD { width:189.76pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 2303/10 Shukri IBRAHIM

/99) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Turkish national, Mr İbrahim

    On 7 October 2016 the Vice-President of the Second Section invited the Government to submit further observations, if they so wish, following the judgment in Ibrahim and Others v. the United

In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month-period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the

and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court to strike the case out of its list of cases. ln the event of failure to pay this sum within the said

    At the material time, the fifth applicant, Mr İbrahim Bektaş, was detained in Akhisar T-Type Prison for the offence of attempting to overthrow the constitutional order. 18.

/07) against the Czech Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Guinean nationals, Mr Ibrahima

    The applicants, Mansur Pad, [1] Salim Ibrahim Manesh, Morad Afrasi, [2] Ali Afrasi, Adel Keshavarz, Said   Pourmola   Borazan and Veysi Eli Mikail, [3] are all Iranian citizens,