AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1012DEC000314821
12 octobre 2023
12 octobre 2023
inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 3148/21 Audrius ZAKARKA against Lithuania The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting
Source officielleChambre 6/Section 4
65ba989d59e460cd1e3d49ec
31 janvier 2024
31 janvier 2024
HERRY Représentant : Me Géraldine SITTINGER, avocat au barreau de PARIS, vestiaire : J083 ORDONNANCE DE CLÔTURE PARTIELLE (article 780 du Code de Procédure Civile) Nous, Gilles CASSOU DE SAINT-MATHURIN
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4735
2 septembre 2003
2 septembre 2003
The minutes of the sitting show that the applicant had been authorised to address his fellow-Members for thirty minutes.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1204DEC005092510
4 décembre 2012
4 décembre 2012
The applicant’s appeal against this decision was rejected on 9 March 2010 by the Regional Court of The Hague sitting in Assen.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1130DEC002182793
30 novembre 1994
30 novembre 1994
They are half-siblings. Before the Commission they are represented by Mrs. Siv Westerberg, a lawyer practising in Gothenburg.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0916DEC006053400
16 septembre 2004
16 septembre 2004
Relevant domestic law Section 1671 of the Civil Code in its version in force until 30 June 1998 provided that the court sitting in family matters has to grant the custody of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0208DEC001997615
8 février 2022
8 février 2022
No damages were sought on behalf of the fourth sibling, who was then living with the family and who, at that time, had been officially recognised by the applicant. 5 .
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0306DEC001623007
6 mars 2012
6 mars 2012
comes from and one cannot locate who is singing ... ...
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0522DEC006190300
22 mai 2003
22 mai 2003
On 18 November 1997 the Review Chamber of the Leoben Regional Court ( Ratskammer ), sitting in camera, dismissed this request. On 4 December 1997 the applicants appealed against this decision.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-249350
27 février 2026
27 février 2026
In particular, sitting as a panel of nine judges, the Constitutional Court decided jointly, by two decisions, on the election of I.A.M., J. L., and D.M.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0323DEC006811201
23 mars 2004
23 mars 2004
On the liquidation trustee's appeal, the Supreme Court, sitting as a second-instance court, quashed the first-instance order on 4 July 1996 and remitted the case to the Regional Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1211DEC005207299
11 décembre 2001
11 décembre 2001
inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 52072/99 by Zygmunt BOROWSKI against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1016DEC001510311
16 octobre 2012
16 octobre 2012
inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 15103/11 Ahmed Yussuf FARAH against Denmark The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0610DEC005777110
10 juin 2014
10 juin 2014
} .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 57771/10 Dragoljub MARINKOVIĆ against Serbia The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0108DEC000046903
8 janvier 2008
8 janvier 2008
sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 469/03 by Mustafa DURAK against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0517JUD004246113
17 mai 2016
17 mai 2016
sitting.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1282
27 octobre 2009
27 octobre 2009
Tribunal established by law Inclusion without sufficient legal basis of lay judges on bench of criminal court: violation Facts – By a judgment of 2001, the Criminal Division of the Supreme Court, sitting
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4178
19 octobre 2004
19 octobre 2004
Counsel for the applicant gave his address towards 5 a.m., by which time the sitting had lasted for 15 hours and 45 minutes. The defendants, including the applicant, were the last to speak.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4130
10 novembre 2004
10 novembre 2004
In particular, it noted that certain aspects of the status of military judges sitting in the State Security Courts raised doubts as to the independence and impartiality of the courts concerned… That being
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205600
28 septembre 2020
28 septembre 2020
The applicant was the director of the domestic corporate banking division of Kaupthing Bank hf. in Iceland, as well as sitting on the group credit committee.
Source officiellePage 9 sur 2681