France (n o 2) , n o 39282/98, § 75-76, 7 janvier 2003, et Vermeersch c.   France , n o 39277/98, 30 janvier 2001). 72.

objection of incompatibility ratione materiae , despite the fact that some of the proceedings in issue concerned only the lawfulness of the detention without involving any related pecuniary claims (see Vermeersch

AB, représentant le préfet des Pyrénées-Atlantiques, - et les observations de Me Vermersch, substituant Me Romi, représentant la société Dragages du Pont de Lescar.

(...) (3) Yasaklanmış hakların geri verilmesi için, hükümlünün veya vekilinin talebi üzerine, hükmü veren mahkemenin veya hükümlünün ikametgâhının bulunduğu yerdeki aynı derecedeki mahkemenin karar vermesi

Varenne, première conseillère, - les conclusions de Mme Michel, rapporteure publique ; - les observations de Me De Smedt, substituant Me Bonduel, représentant Mme B ; - les observations de Me Veermesch-Bocquet

Government’s objection of incompatibility ratione materiae despite the fact that the proceedings at issue concerned only the lawfulness of the detention without involving any related pecuniary claims (see Vermeersch

objection of incompatibility ratione materiae , despite the fact that some of the proceedings in issue concerned only the lawfulness of the detention without involving any related pecuniary claims (see Vermeersch

well as other members of the security forces who had taken part in the operation had been heard as witnesses and had stated that the armed clash had been caused by Murat Akman’s resistance ( karşılık vermesi