CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Tribunal Administratif de Marseille
ORTA_2302281_20230322
22 mars 2023
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 8 mars 2023, la SARL Générale Entreprise Rénovation - GER ELEC (GER), représentée par Me Woimant, demande au Tribunal, sur le fondement de l'article
ORTA_2208341_20221011
11 octobre 2022
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête enregistrée le 5 octobre 2022, la société Home Services, représentée par Me Woimant, doit être regardée comme demandant au tribunal : 1°) de prononcer
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0116JUD006046900
16 janvier 2007
His claim for widows’ benefits was made on 18 July 2000 and was rejected on 28 July 2000 on the ground that he was not entitled to widow’s benefits because he was not a woman.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12626
17 septembre 2019
Russia (communicated case) - 40419/19 Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Alleged lack of investigations into online harassment against a woman
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0219DEC006103600
19 février 2002
That application was refused by the Benefits Agency on 2 March 2000 on the grounds that the applicant was not a woman.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1104DEC003695102
4 novembre 2003
The applicant appealed and on 20 August 2002 the Appeal Tribunal decided that the appeal could not succeed because the applicant was not a woman.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0918DEC005794600
18 septembre 2001
The applicant claims that, had he been a woman and had his wife been a man, he would have been aware of his entitlement to widow’s benefits in the event of her death.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0923DEC002805402
23 septembre 2008
To be eligible for WMA, a woman had to be entitled to child benefit. The Court considers, as it held in Cornwell v. the United Kingdom (no.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0417DEC001621290
17 avril 1991
1986; 2) assault and indecent assault of a named woman between 1 September 1986 and 30 November 1986; 3) assault, indecent assault, robbery and abduction of a named woman between 10 June 1986 and 31 December
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-197192
3 octobre 2019
In 2003, after his unsuccessful asylum application, he married a Swiss woman 29 years older than himself.
ECLI:CEDH:001-242810
20 mars 2025
Sudan, she would face a real risk of being subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention mainly due to the general situation in the country and her particular vulnerability as a single woman
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0607DEC006103600
7 juin 2001
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0607DEC006533401
If the applicant were a woman, he could look forward to entitlement to a Widow’s Pension in the future, when he would no longer be entitled to the Widowed Mother’s Allowance. 4.
PRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1440238-1504073
5 septembre 2005
, or (2) the date of retirement fixed by a notice, at age 65+ for a man or 60+ for a woman, would receive a frozen rate of REA for life.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0429DEC002804202
29 avril 2008
On 4 May 2001 the applicant was informed that his claim had been disallowed as he was not a woman. On 30 May 2001 the applicant appealed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0909DEC000483903
9 septembre 2008
His claim for widows’ benefits was made on 8 February 2003 and was rejected on 13 February 2003 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows’ benefits because he was not a woman.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0210DEC003196802
10 février 2009
His claim for widows’ benefits was made in February 2002 and was rejected on 9 March 2002 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows’ benefits because he was not a woman.
ECLI:CEDH:001-171880
7 février 2017
The applicant challenged this decision before the High Administrative Court ( Visoki upravni sud Republike Hrvatske ) arguing, in particular, that she had been discriminated against as a woman who had
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0909DEC000035104
a man has made a claim to the domestic authorities for bereavement benefits, he cannot be regarded as a “victim” of the alleged discrimination involved in the refusal to pay such benefits, because a woman
ECLI:CEDH:002-924
10 juin 2010
Switzerland - 25762/07 Judgment 10.6.2010 [Section I] Article 14 Discrimination Unmarried woman of a certain age debarred from adopting a second child: no violation Facts – After adopting a first
Page 9 sur 144