CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0429DEC006338616
29 avril 2025
» Article 92 Condition juridique des navires « 1.
Page 9 sur 10
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0726JUD005552300
26 juillet 2007
(Article 63 § 1 (1) and (2)).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0706JUD002198705
6 juillet 2017
pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. 82.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0114JUD003877105
14 janvier 2016
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 13 IN CONNECTION WITH ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION 67.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0110JUD008127012
10 janvier 2017
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 58.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0623DEC003189006
23 juin 2009
He only contended that evidence obtained in breach of Article 13 of the Basic Law and Article 8 of the Convention could not be used against him.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708JUD004298798
8 juillet 2004
(Article 282 of the CC), deliberately entering into contracts disadvantageous to the company he was managing (Article 220 of the CC) and making false official documents (Article 311 of the CC).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0920JUD002697295
20 septembre 2005
The Prosecutor had warned those present that the body could be booby-trapped and a decision was taken to trail the body for a short distance with a rope attached to an armoured vehicle.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0503JUD004937909
3 mai 2012
21954/93, §§ 91-92, ECHR 1999-III). 82.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0917JUD001086509
17 septembre 2014
2 of the Convention in respect of Mrs Mocanu, Article 3 of the Convention in respect of Mr Stoica and Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in respect of the applicant association, declaring the remainder of
5ème chambre
DCA_22NT00392_20241015
15 octobre 2024
Il résulte de ce qui précède que le moyen tiré de la méconnaissance, par la construction contestée, des dispositions de l'article L. 121-16 du code de l'urbanisme doit être écarté. 92.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-164611
8 juin 2016
On 30 November 2005 S.V. boarded a train to reach his new military unit in Bratsk, Irkutsk Region.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1006JUD003058204
6 octobre 2015
and “Impale the traitors!”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0317JUD005019699
17 mars 2005
He was briefed by Inspector Kelly and assumed the role of Incident Commander.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0515DEC001342012
15 mai 2012
The court found that the retention of the child in Estonia was wrongful within the meaning of Article 3 of the Hague Convention and that the father was entitled to claim her return under Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127JUD005955208
27 janvier 2015
59 of the Criminal Code), Armenia (Article 21 § 2 of the Criminal Code), Belgium (Article 65 § 1 of the Criminal Code), Bosnia and Herzegovina (Article 54 § 2 of the Criminal Code), Bulgaria (Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0930JUD003927198
30 septembre 2004
In any event, neither the investigator nor the prosecutor who confirmed the detention were sufficiently independent and impartial for the purposes of Article 5 § 3, in view of the practical role they played
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1113JUD002314593
13 novembre 2003
The case originated in two applications (nos. 23145/93 and 25091/94) against Turkey lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0405JUD003306010
5 avril 2016
Therefore, it violated his rights under Article 6. 69.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1113DEC004323198
The appeal must be lodged within seven days (Article 345) with the trial court (Article 348 § 4 in conjunction with Article 317 § 2 until February 1998 and Article 318 § 2 after that).