79 was to make it difficult to impose a more severe disciplinary penalty on appeal - fact that there was no tribunal to which jurisdiction could be transferred did not suffice to establish the Appeals

, unsuccessfully claimed that, inter alia , she had been discriminated against in the enjoyment of her pension rights compared to her colleagues with equal qualifications who, given their residence (more

], no. 21986/93, ECHR   2000-VII), was the investigation in the present case by the domestic authorities in breach of Article 2 of the Convention, in particular having regard to its duration of more

Result: more than four years and five months. B.

Those adjournments, coupled with the excessive delay with which the applicant on each occasion requested that a new hearing date be fixed, were the cause of a delay of more than twenty years for which

de la violation des articles 191 et 592 du Code de procédure pénale ; Attendu qu'il résulte des mentions de l'arrêt attaqué que la décision a été rendue par la chambre d'accusation composée de Mme More

More specifically, was it in line with the requirement that the provisions of the criminal law must not be extensively construed to an accused’s detriment, for instance by analogy (see, for example, Del

More information is available on its website ( http://www.echr.coe.int )   Press contacts Stefano Piedimonte (tel : + 33 (0)3 90 21 42 04) or Céline Menu-Lange (tel : + 33 (0)3 90 21 58 77) Tracey

        QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant’s right to private life, and more specifically her right to physical integrity in its procedural aspect, ensured by Article  

The application was not lodged until 26 November 1998, that is more than six months after the final decision of the domestic courts. It was therefore out of time.

and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     30510/18 16/06/2018 Mariya Gennadiyivna Yeryomina 04/10/1983 Pavlo Volodymyrovych Goliver Kryvyy Rig 25/11/2011   pending   More

years and 6 months 3,100 Vasyl Volodymyrovych Menyo 26/04/1966   2,400     70556/17 20/09/2017 Sergiy Ivanovych Volyk 31/07/1972 Denys Vasylyovych Ponomarenko Odesa 17/05/2011 pending More

They have already lasted more than twenty-six years. 20.

By then it had already lasted more than eighteen years and one month for two levels of jurisdiction. 23.

These statutes provide for a penalty of not less than 10 years and not more than life in prison.

When national policy was not complied with, the interests of the State in principle carried more weight, even if it meant that a family would not be able to live together.

Regarding the concept of “immediate risk”, the Court had already applied it in a more flexible manner than in traditional Osman -type incident-based situations, taking into account the common trajectory

Regional Court more than six years to bring him to trial.

However, in so far as a term of imprisonment is concerned, the penalty may not exceed the most severe maximum penalty by more than one third.

More favourable pension rules applied to people who had served in these regions.