CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0210JUD001234310
10 février 2011
Of the prisoners, 47,265 were men, 3,129 were women, and 449 were juveniles. Men, women, and juveniles were held separately. Detainees were held apart from prisoners.
Page 92 sur 131
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0524DEC002627709
24 mai 2018
The applicant’s complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1201DEC003455008
1 décembre 2016
The applicants’ complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0214JUD002089303
14 février 2008
The applicants were represented by Mr Leclerc and Ms Brouquet-Canale, lawyers practising in Paris. The French Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs E.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0205JUD006728610
5 février 2013
Both documents were signed by the applicant. 17 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0313JUD000137704
13 mars 2014
The Court notes that no compelling reasons to restrict the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer were cited by the Government.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0312DEC003685506
12 mars 2013
The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108DEC002627908
8 janvier 2013
It concerned employment-related issues which, under the Courts Act, were open to judicial scrutiny by courts of general competence ( У-5.бр.381/2010 ). COMPLAINTS 19.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522JUD004402709
22 mai 2012
The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1118DEC002267411
18 novembre 2014
Moreover, those flats had never served any “official purpose”; they were simply residential accommodation. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0327JUD005842810
27 mars 2014
not aimed at curing ailments and, therefore, were not “medical”. 6.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1020JUD000733413
20 octobre 2016
The sanitary facilities were in the same room as the living area, from which they were not fully separated.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1010JUD004103807
10 octobre 2013
The concrete floors were always damp. The walls were covered with mould. Because of the dampness of the cell, the applicant developed painful breathing. 23.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD006336209
15 janvier 2015
His home and later his workplace were searched.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1127JUD001732304
27 novembre 2008
Their complaints were dismissed as unsubstantiated. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0625JUD007696301
25 juin 2009
The applicants were represented by Mr M. Ekimdjiev, a lawyer practising in Plovdiv. The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs M.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2270593-2428511
Four passages in the article were considered to be defamatory: “1. Bias. She (Mrs Borrel) complains of the bias shown by the judges. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1119JUD002986005
19 novembre 2009
The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0208DEC002512606
8 février 2011
the Czech Republic The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 8 February 2011 as a Chamber composed of: Dean Spielmann, President, Elisabet Fura, Karel Jungwiert, Mark Villiger, Isabelle
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0506DEC002442903
6 mai 2008
Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 6 May 2008 as a Chamber composed of: Peer Lorenzen, President, Rait Maruste, Volodymyr Butkevych, Mark Villiger, Isabelle