CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7650
16 juillet 2013
The inquest opened in March 2012 and ended at the beginning of May 2012.
Page 92 sur 819
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905DEC002879010
5 septembre 2017
24240/07, 20 March 2012).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0505DEC003269205
5 mai 2009
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0515DEC002513402
15 mai 2007
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0829DEC006757801
29 août 2002
352 of 19 April 2000, no. 222 of 19 March 2001, no. 152 of 13 March 2002.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-127203
18 septembre 2013
On 10 March 2009 the Baku Court of Appeal granted the applicant’s appeal and ordered his release.
ECLI:CEDH:001-192122
7 mars 2019
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 1. Crash 1.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13596
15 mars 2022
260 March 2022 Communauté genevoise d'action syndicale (CGAS) v.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2872585-3151186
24 septembre 2009
may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17 ‑ member Grand Chamber of the Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1023DEC003744397
23 octobre 2001
The court quashed the contested judgment and remitted the case to the Bielsko-Biała Regional Prosecutor, holding that a further investigation should be carried out.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0520DEC001023102
20 mai 2003
He also complains about the failure of the State authorities to execute the judgment of 3 March 1998 within a reasonable time and about the unreasonable length of the proceedings in his case.
TROISIEME CHAMBRE
660f94efa40f8b0008cb734d
4 avril 2024
a : condamné Madame [C] [X] à payer à la société Quercy Marée la somme de 299 000 euros, débouté la Sarl Quercy Marée de sa demande de condamnation de M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0929DEC005132699
29 septembre 2005
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0313DEC002723803
13 mars 2008
At the end of March 2002 the first applicant talked to investigator Sergey L. from the district prosecutor’s office, who was in charge of her son’s case.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0331JUD002304393
31 mars 1998
Between 9 October 1984 and 27 March 1985 the Versailles RCID carried out a number of searches and seizures at Mr Slimane-Kaïd’s home address and on the premises of Provex; but they also carried
comm
613724d2cd58014677418a60
23 janvier 2007
septembre 2001, la société Maury a été condamnée à payer à la société Prodim une certaine somme à titre de réparation de la rupture anticipée du contrat ; que soutenant que la société Distribution Casino
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0901REP001418488
1 septembre 1993
The particular circumstances of the case 15.
Tribunal Administratif de Toulouse
DTA_2600576_20260212
12 février 2026
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête enregistrée le 23 janvier 2026 et deux mémoires enregistrés le 9 février 2026, la SAS Dauphine Isolation Environnement (DIE), représentée par Me Camiere,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002885911
15 novembre 2016
On 10 March 2015 the applicants requested the referral of the case to the Grand Chamber in accordance with Article 43 of the Convention.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1215JUD003279407
15 décembre 2015
On 17 March 2010 the application was communicated to the Government. THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.