. ; Vu la requête, enregistrée le 27 décembre 1989 au secrétariat du Contentieux du Conseil d'Etat, présentée par Mme Catherine X..., demeurant chemin de la Montagne à La Balme-de-Sillingy (74330) ; Mme

On 8 December 2004 the Supreme Administrative Court, sitting with five judges, decided not to hold a hearing in the case.

  The provision of S. 345 para. 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure did not generally exclude any judge from sitting again on a case sent back by a superior court.

   On 2 July 1991 the Alexandroupolis Criminal Court sitting at first instance (Monomeles Plimmeliodikeio) acquitted the applicants (judgment no. 2092/1991).

He was subsequently charged with rape and tried on indictment at the High Court of Justiciary sitting at Paisley between 7 and 11   June 2008.

On 18 June 1999 the Constitution was amended and the military judges sitting on the bench of State Security Courts were replaced by civilian judges.

ÚS 36/2016, given by the same chamber on the same day, the Constitutional Court ruled that Judge Y was not excluded from sitting in the applicant’s case.

They finally allege that they did not have a fair trial since the judges sitting on the bench of the Denizli Assize Court were attached to the Supreme Council of Judges and Public Prosecutors.

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Helena Jäderblom, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Branko Lubarda, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı

    On 24 October 2013 the Regional Court of The Hague sitting in Arnhem dismissed the applicant’s appeal. 16.

On 7 March 2004 the Supreme Administrative Court, sitting as a full court, set aside the judgment of 30 July 2002.

Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Guido Raimondi, President,   Peer Lorenzen,   András Sajó,   Nebojša Vučinić,  

The District Court (sitting as a panel of judges that included P.K.) found partly in favor for L., thus affecting the applicant’s property rights.

display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION FINAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 13706/02 by Igor Vasylyovych PANCHENKO against Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting

xa0;               against Germany          The European Commission of Human Rights (First Chamber) sitting

That decision was upheld on appeal by the Court of Appeal, sitting in a different panel of three judges, on 12 June 2002.

On 19 September 1995 the new trial commenced before the Court of Assizes sitting with another jury and on 14 June 1996 the Court of Assizes convicted the applicant of raping A.H. and sentenced him to 14

width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 51975/99 by Pauli LELLA against Finland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

On 27 May 2004 the Regional Court ( rechtbank ) of The Hague, sitting in Groningen, upheld the decision of the Minister.