CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1114JUD004008103
14 novembre 2008
This judgment became binding on 11 March 2004 and was enforced on 29 April 2005. 7.
Page 93 sur 1597
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0206DEC000251215
6 février 2025
However, the Court does not consider it necessary to answer this question definitively because the applications are in any event inadmissible for the reasons set out below.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0530DEC003492521
30 mai 2024
The applicant complained that her extradition would violate Article 3 of the Convention because, if extradited, she risked ill-treatment in a Russian prison because of a conflict between her partner and
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0917DEC001049521
17 septembre 2024
Seventeen other hearings were adjourned because of the nationwide lockdowns announced during the COVID-19 pandemic (from March to May 2020 and from November 2020 to April 2021), during which the courts
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0317DEC001726823
17 mars 2026
In addition, he alleged that he had lost earnings because he had no longer been able to perform his part-time job (as a taxi driver).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0630DEC001706406
30 juin 2009
The applicant did not have the right to the restitution of property within the statutory time-limit until 31 December 2001 because he had not been a Lithuanian citizen.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0330DEC007193301
30 mars 2004
He submitted, in particular, that the regulation of 28 September 1999 had not been valid and enforceable because it had never been officially published.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929DEC000564307
29 septembre 2009
He has been unfit for service because of illness ( dienstunfähig krank ) since then.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1211DEC007800801
11 décembre 2003
On 11 August 1994 the applicant filed an action for damages in the Zadar Municipal Court ( Općinski sud u Zadru ) against the Croatia Insurance Company ( Croatia osiguranje ), because the building was
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0520DEC002375994
20 mai 1998
in the past he had threatened judges of that court and because a judge who had earlier dealt with his case became president of the aforesaid court.
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:CR03431
20 décembre 2017
Thierry A..., beau-fils et ayant-droit de Mireille A..., avait eu connaissance des faits d'abus de faiblesse reprochés à Mme X..., épouse Y..., pour en déduire que ceux-ci n'étaient pas prescrits, sans
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:CR02308
30 octobre 2018
l'audience déclarer qu'elle ignorait tout de cette activité notamment l'absence de déclaration fiscale et de l'absence de paiement des charges sociales des deux salariés réguliers qui sont son fils et son beau-frère
civ2
61372451cd580146774147ee
25 novembre 2004
X... ne poursuivait comme but que de gagner du temps afin, le terme de la promesse souscrite par ses beaux-parents étant atteint, de leur permettre d'éluder leur engagement ; Qu'en statuant ainsi,
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2023:CR01431
21 novembre 2023
Pas question, pour tout ce beau monde, d'organiser des réunions à [Localité 1].
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0508REP001117084
8 mai 1990
Insofar as they concerned the tasting procedure, they were irrelevant because the results of this procedure provided insufficient evidence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0831DEC003804597
31 août 1999
They note that in the large majority of these hearings, the procedure was adjourned at counsel’s request and because the applicant was prevented from being present.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601DEC000024902
1 juin 2006
The court also held: “The establishment of this fact has legal meaning for Mr Arkhipov because it is decisive for the personal pecuniary rights of the plaintiff.”
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3285
15 juin 2006
She also considered that she had been deprived of any means of advertising her business – even though it was not illegal – because of the existence of a provision in the Criminal Code making it an offence
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-172959
21 mars 2017
According to the letter, the body was transported during the night with a black car and the investigation conducted by the police could have been arranged because the suspects had high-ranking relatives
ECLI:CEDH:001-111068
10 avril 2012
The Regional Court noted that in his appeal the applicant had indicated that he had confessed and that he would not evade investigation because he had to repay a credit to a bank.