The Court reiterates in this respect that finding of a violation does not imply that the applicants did not have to bear any responsibility for the breach of domestic law they had committed

A number of political initiatives have been taken at the level of the United Nations aimed at settling the Cyprus problem on the basis of institutional arrangements acceptable to both sides. 17.

When taking part in civil proceedings, the prosecutor did not have any special powers, such as the right to participate in the court’s deliberations or to attend them, the prosecutor was afforded the same

Since January 2003 they have been represented by Mr V. Gribincea, of the Chişinău Bar. II.     ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FACTS 25.

as a Chamber composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President ,   Rait Maruste,   Karel Jungwiert,   Renate Jaeger,   Mark Villiger,   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, judges ,   Alejandro

Moreover, in the context of detainees, the Court has emphasised that persons in detention are in a vulnerable position and that the authorities have a duty to protect their physical well-being and that

    The particular circumstances of the cases         The Government have made no comments on the applicants' submissions as to the facts.

They also argued that they did not have an effective domestic remedy to complain about those conditions at the national level.

They also argued that they did not have an effective domestic remedy to complain about those conditions at the national level.

représentants légaux domiciliés en cette qualité au siège [Adresse 14] [Localité 6] Représentée par Me Marie VERRANDO de la SELARL LX RENNES-ANGERS, postulante, avocate au barreau de RENNES et par Me Alexandra

Nor have any other circumstances preventing [the applicant’s] extradition been identified.

According to the applicants, these sums represented the difference between the pensions they had been receiving after the quashing and the pensions they would have received if there had been no quashing

Moreover, the defence noted that the trial judge was the same judge who had earlier remitted the case to the prosecutor and might therefore have been prejudiced in this case.

One of them allegedly shouted to the others “What have you done?!”

    Three days after the arrest the applicant was allowed to have a meeting with counsel. 10.

formal requirements and time ‑ limits laid down in domestic law and, further, that any procedural means that might prevent a breach of the Convention should have been used.

According to him, he could not have voiced his allegations earlier, as he was not allowed to receive visitors during the weekend and did not have free access to a telephone.

At the same time, they asserted that the applicant had not challenged the police actions in court and had not sought to have criminal proceedings instituted against the police officers. 49.

They have not heard any news of Ramazan Umarov since then. 22.