CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

10 526 résultats pour « Bessala »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1020DEC003087702

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2005

20 octobre 2005

    The Government’s objection that the application was not validly lodged on the applicant’s behalf In their written submissions the Government disputed that Mr Shepelin was duly authorised

Page 94 sur 527

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1128JUD005733314

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2023

28 novembre 2023

A., a fact which confirms that he was one of those who received bribe payments on behalf of A.T. ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1204DEC001468889

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 1989

4 décembre 1989

      The particular facts of the case           The facts of the present case, as submitted on behalf of the applicant, may be summarised

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0429DEC000786406

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2010

29 avril 2010

The first four applicants have lodged the application on their own behalf and on behalf of Mr Erdoğan Çakir, the husband of the first applicant and the father of the second, third and fourth applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-228457

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2023

5 octobre 2023

inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based; inability to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0319JUD002426594

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2002

19 mars 2002

    On 29 March 1993 the solicitors acting on behalf of the applicant’s employers wrote to the Fair Employment Tribunal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1021DEC003642897

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 1998

21 octobre 1998

Further evidence was adduced on behalf of the Crown as well.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0429DEC004608607

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2010

29 avril 2010

referred to as 4 September 2007) the first applicant revoked the authority form issued for her representatives Ms Tseytlina and Ms Oshirova and requested that all legal proceedings initiated on her behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0105DEC006405400

Admin. suprême

5 janvier 2006

5 janvier 2006

Prior to that, on 14   August 1995, the second applicant had authorised the first applicant, then director of company ILaS Vranov s.r.o., to act on the company’s behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0304DEC001558506

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2008

4 mars 2008

The applicant’s husband then lodged an appeal, on behalf of his wife, with the Appeals Board against the refusal to grant her an entry visa to France.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0406DEC002048992

Admin. suprême

6 avril 1994

6 avril 1994

     (d) to examine or have examined witnesses against him and      to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on      his behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1014DEC001812391

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 1992

14 octobre 1992

        On 25 October 1989 solicitors acting on the applicant's behalf submitted a fresh application for legal aid.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-158170

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2015

28 septembre 2015

    On 10 March 2011 lawyers acting on behalf of the applicants requested the Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office to inform them whether a criminal investigation was launched with respect to two

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0612DEC001115009

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2012

12 juin 2012

    The Court further notes that the first applicant introduced the request for withdrawal of Pamplona civil judge no. 3 in her own name and not on behalf of her client, despite the fact that

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-680

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2010

16 décembre 2010

Since there was no European consensus on the scientific and legal definition of the beginning of life and since the rights claimed on behalf of the foetus and those of the mother were inextricably interconnected

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1203DEC003557397

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 1997

3 décembre 1997

He also alleges that the Court of Appeal referred to bundles of evidence put in on behalf of Lord Aldington which the applicant had no chance to consult.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1113DEC002423710

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2018

13 novembre 2018

On behalf of the bank the contract was concluded by D., the director of the respective local branch of the bank.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0104DEC002300305

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2012

4 janvier 2012

Apostol, acting on behalf of their Agent. The circumstances of the case 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0507DEC004003420

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2025

7 mai 2025

The Court further notes that the applicant lodged the application only on his own behalf, not on behalf of the children (compare R.L. and Others v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0110JUD006303810

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2017

10 janvier 2017

    The Government submitted that the applicant’s signature on one of the documents authorising Mr Frimu to act on his behalf had been forged and that, in any event, the applicant had failed

Source officielle