Yashchyshena died and Mr   Leonid Antonovych Yashchyshen, her heir, has expressed his wish to pursue her application before the Court. These applicants are represented by Mr   I.

M.K. also died in the course of proceedings and I.K. replaced him as defendant. On 12 June 2007 the concluding hearing before the Zagreb Municipal Court was held.

During the proceedings S.K. died.

the Government made a request to restore the application to the Court’s list of cases, as in the course of the proceedings to enforce the Court’s decision, they were informed that the applicant had died

persons, was found guilty of, among other crimes, organisation of attempted murder of the director of the company where he had worked as a senior manager, and the murder of a   schoolgirl who had died

On 4   May 2013 she died in hospital. According to the notice of death the cause of her death was atherosclerosis with gangrene.

On 7 October 2004 the first applicant’s brother and the second and third applicants’ son died in a car accident involving an unidentified vehicle.

  [1] One of the applicants in application no. 29260/11, namely Mr Alexander Yankov Stankov, died after lodging his application with the Court.

He died on 16 May 2008, in the course of the proceedings before the Court. On 22 October 2008 the Ljubljana Local Court declared that the second applicant was one of the first applicant’s heirs.

On 30 September 2012 the applicant’s son, Mr Nikolay Yevgenyevich Krivosheyev, who at the time was serving a sentence of imprisonment, died in the town hospital of Novotroitsk, the Orenburg Region.

However, the letter of 7 November 2007 returned post-marked that the applicant died. The Court notes that no heirs have made themselves known, expressing a wish to pursue the application.

However, given that the complainant had died before she could be questioned in court, sufficient guarantees should have been put in place to safeguard the rights of the defence.

case rendered ineffective by lengthy delays and procedural problems: violation [This case was referred to the Grand Chamber on 12 November 2007] Facts : In May 1993 the applicants' twenty-year old son died

The applicants argued that he should have been exempted from service because his father had died during reservist training.

    On 20 December 2006 the Court was informed that Mr   Gheorghe   Rozsa had died on 17 December 2005 and that Mr   Gabor   Rozsa and Mr Mihaly Rozsa, his sons and heirs,

decisions given against a socially/State-owned company) After the present applications were communicated to the Government, the applicants’ representative notified the Court that the applicants had died

On 31 December 1993 Mr Y. died and on 24 March 1993 his son Mr V. joined the proceedings as his successor.

On 17 June 2007 he died of cardiac arrest.

They claimed damages for the death of the first applicant’s husband and the second applicant’s father, who had died as a conscript in the Yugoslav army in 1989.

The brother had died in the meantime. At the trial, the applicant and the three co-accused made use of their right to remain silent.