CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0121DEC003414620
21 janvier 2025
Subsequently, on 27 February 2018 the Novi Pazar Higher Court quashed the enforcement order (which was based on the judgment of 21 March 2017) in the applicant’s case, referring to
Page 94 sur 819
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226503
6 octobre 2008
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. B.
ECLI:CEDH:001-228185
19 septembre 2023
Ukraine (dec.), no. 75865/11, §§ 50-63, 3 March 2020; and Mikiashvili and Others v. Georgia (dec.), nos. 18865/11 and 51865/11, §§ 47-56, 19 January 2021)? 2.
ECLI:CEDH:001-169574
15 novembre 2016
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2891840-3179094
13 octobre 2009
may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17 ‑ member Grand Chamber of the Court.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0708JUD001501811
8 juillet 2014
Medical examinations were carried out daily, and in cases of emergency inmates could be taken to the emergency ward of Stara Zagora Hospital.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1217JUD000045918
17 décembre 2020
carried out. 40.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0705JUD004304405
5 juillet 2011
In the case of Saçılık and Others v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-112348
7 juin 2011
After having done so, the police again communicated the case for comment to the Petroleum Directorate, which on 26 March 1985 made a statement to the police.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0901JUD002064918
1 septembre 2020
In the case of R.R. and R.D. v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-123822
8 juillet 2013
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2016:195
17 mars 2016
Order of the Court - 17 March 2016#Ibercaja Banco#Case C-613/15
ECLI:CEDH:001-220479
4 octobre 2022
The removal was carried out on 17 March 2020, by a bailiff and two of his aides and took several hours.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0107DEC002042902
7 janvier 2003
On 8 March 1999 the applicants requested the District Court to revise the Registrar’s decision (as approved by the court on 1 March 1999) concerning costs, which they considered excessive.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC003845309
30 août 2016
The circumstances of the case 2. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2021:SO01046
22 septembre 2021
Les relations contractuelles étaient régies par la convention collective nationale des établissements et services pour personnes inadaptées et handicapées du 15 mars 1966. 3.
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2025:CO00041
29 janvier 2025
La société Intermarché Casino achats, société à responsabilité limitée, dont le siège est [Adresse 7], a formé le pourvoi n° E 23-15.828, contre l'arrêt n° RG 21/13481 rendu le 15 mars 2023 par la cour
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0121JUD002911507
21 janvier 2020
of 13 March 1979.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0725JUD001108206
25 juillet 2013
Cassese, and Prof Ch. Tomuschat. The Russian Government (“the Government”) in the two cases were represented by Mr P. Laptev and Mrs V.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1021JUD005550807
21 octobre 2013
The entire operation to liquidate the above-mentioned individuals was carried out on the basis of a decision by the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the USSR dated 5 March 1940...