display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 38250/03 by Larisa Yevgenyevna LAZUTINA and Olga Valeryevna DANILOVA against Switzerland The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting

xa0;              against Sweden           The European Commission of Human Rights (Second Chamber) sitting

inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } FOURTH SECTION FINAL DECISION Application no. 61437/00 by Jan JAGIEŁŁO against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } THIRD SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 38545/97 by Olaf WUNDERLICH against Austria The European Court of Human Rights, sitting

inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 2612/03 by Ewald STADLER against Austria The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting

0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 26560/05 by Konstantin Konstantinov and Irinka Hristova YAKIMOVI against Bulgaria The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting

213.96pt; display:inline-block }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 4289/11 Rebwar Abdullah ISMAIL and others against the United Kingdom The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

application no. 22729/17, he claims that his right to be heard by an independent and impartial tribunal was violated due to the alleged financial interests of two out of the five Supreme Court Justices sitting

After the first-instance judgment, on 31 March 2011, the Supreme Court, sitting as a full bench adopted a resolution (III CZP 112/10) in which it acknowledged that the respective provisions of civil and

138.53pt; display:inline-block }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 41917/06 Batyr Dzhorakulovich ROZYYEV against Russia   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting

They had thus been treated in the same manner as Romanian pupils sitting it, even though their situation had been different.

44919/98 by Pasquale CECERE, Giuseppe ZARRO, Antonio FRANZESE, Angelo Stefano DI GIOVANNI and Carmine IANNAZZONE against Italy [Note2]     The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section) sitting

    On 30 June 2008, sitting as a cassation court, the Supreme Court quashed the judgment of 9 November 2005 following an appeal by the creditor on points of law.

S. against Germany     The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 6 June 2000 as a Chamber composed of     Mr   A.

margin-bottom:0pt }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 6161/05 Leonid Leonidovich KOLESNIKOV and Lyudmila Vasilyevna KOLESNIKOVA against Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting

Turkey, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mrs   E. Palm , President ,   Mr   L.

display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION PARTIAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 58058/00 by Yahya KEZER and others against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

228.11pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION PARTIAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 17914/09 by Önder DOLUTAŞ against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting

inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 73033/01 by Şendoğan YAZICI against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting

In that context, her subsequent choice to undertake the requisite pupillage with a view to sitting for the Bar examinations had been closely related to personal decisions that had been taken over a period