CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

29 469 résultats pour « Becam »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0109DEC002927195

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 2001

9 janvier 2001

The other parties will be only too pleased, when it becomes so flagrantly evident how powerless the Austrian People's Party is vis-a-vis one of their officials who has his own moral concepts.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0726JUD003994603

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2007

26 juillet 2007

This decision became final. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0428DEC002112613

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2020

28 avril 2020

The decision became final on the same day. Relevant domestic law Relevant criminal law (a)    Criminal Code 32.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0306DEC003464004

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2007

6 mars 2007

These allegations attracted considerable attention on both sides of the Irish border and became the subject of police investigation in both jurisdictions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-115518

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2012

28 novembre 2012

    The background of the case On 8 October 1992 the applicant became a shareholder in company L.E., a public limited company based in Ljubljana.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0612DEC004752310

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2018

12 juin 2018

    On 25 June 1991 the Socialist Republic of Slovenia declared its independence and became the Republic of Slovenia (hereinafter “Slovenia”).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0913DEC000669002

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2005

13 septembre 2005

On 23 May 2003 the court confirmed that this decision had become final on 17 June 2000.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925DEC000392715

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2018

25 septembre 2018

The judgments became final between 19 December 2003 and 27   December 2012. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC003201509

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2019

22 janvier 2019

    In the case of Şefik Demir (cited above) the Court held that that remedy had to be exhausted by the applicants whose convictions became final. It further ruled in its judgment of A.Ş.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0715JUD001390709

Admin. suprême

15 juillet 2014

15 juillet 2014

This decision was published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia on 27 March 2009 (no. 21/09) and became final on 16 July 2009. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0923DEC006190711

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2014

23 septembre 2014

The decision became enforceable on 12 February 1998, despite the applicant lodging an appeal, which was dismissed on 21 July 1998.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-144073

Admin. suprême

14 avril 2014

14 avril 2014

The prosecutor found that the alleged offence under Article 160 § 2 became prescribed since the prescription period stood at 10 years and the events at issue had occurred on 11 June 2001.

Source officielle
CC

civ2

61372340cd580146774075c0

Cassation

4 février 1999

4 février 1999

Mme Martine X..., épouse Y..., demeurant ensemble ..., en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 4 juillet 1997 par la cour d'appel de Colmar, au profit de la Banque de l'économie et du Crédit mutuel (BECM

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1202REP002277493

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 1998

2 décembre 1998

  A third suspension was introduced by Legislative Decree No. 26 of 8 February 1988, which became Law No. 108 of 8 April 1988.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0911DEC004229598

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2001

11 septembre 2001

However, he considered that the same reasoning could not apply to tips which were built into payments made by cheque or credit card to their employer since the amounts became the latter’s property.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-221677

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2022

20 novembre 2022

By a High Court judgment, which became final on 5   August 2022, the applicant was convicted of, inter alia, attempted assault with aggravating circumstances.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-217352

Admin. suprême

19 avril 2022

19 avril 2022

By a judgment which became final on 22 January 2021, the applicant was convicted of drug offences and for being in possession of a rifle.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-217347

Admin. suprême

19 avril 2022

19 avril 2022

By a judgment which became final on 10 September 2020, the applicant was convicted, notably, of being in possession of various firearms in a public place.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-217353

Admin. suprême

19 avril 2022

19 avril 2022

By a judgment which became final on 1 April 2020, the applicant was convicted of drug offences, assault and making threats.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-217349

Admin. suprême

19 avril 2022

19 avril 2022

By a judgment which became final on 22 October 2020, the applicant was convicted of drug offences.

Source officielle

Page 95 sur 1474

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC329 résultats

Journal officiel
Dépôts des comptes

R.BECAM

SIREN 920626116GREFFE DU TRIBUNAL DE COMMERCE DE GRENOBLE

10/09/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

FRABECAM

SIREN 532182094GREFFE DU TRIBUNAL DE COMMERCE DE BELFORT

03/09/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

BECAME COMPANY

SIREN 879394773GREFFE DU TRIBUNAL DES ACTIVITÉS ÉCONOMIQUES DE NANCY

31/08/2026

Voir →

Immatriculations et autres annonces RCS A

SCI BECAME 14

SIREN 108299538GREFFE DU TRIBUNAL DE COMMERCE DE CAEN

la location de tous biens immobiliers construits, à construire ou en cours de construction, en pleine propriété, nue-propriété ou usufruit. l'acquisition et la gestion de tous biens immobiliers construits, à construire ou en cours de construction, en pleine propriété, nue-propriété ou usufruit. la mise en valeur, la transformation, l'aménagement, la gestion par location ou autrement desdits biens acquis, la prise de participation, l'acquisition, la detention et la gestion de parts de sociétés ci

11/08/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

SOBECAMAT

SIREN 441550951GREFFE DU TRIBUNAL DE COMMERCE DE VILLEFRANCHE-TARARE

06/08/2026

Voir →