His complaint, however, was not examined on the merits.

B obtained the tenancy of a flat, but difficulties arose because of his drinking, his constant assaults on the applicant and his failure to pay the rent.

    The applicant alleged, in particular, that his right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions had been violated as a result of the dismissal of the claim for restitution of his late father

à la Cour d'Appel de NÎMES, magistrat désigné par le Premier Président de la Cour d'Appel de NÎMES pour statuer sur les appels des ordonnances des Juges des Libertés et de la Détention du ressort, rendues

He also complained of various irregularities in dealing with his request for review and his action for fair redress (see paragraphs 17-22 below).

his right to respect for his family life as provided in Article 8 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “1.

    Between his arrest and his sentencing the applicant was detained on remand.

    The applicant, who at no point requested legal aid to cover the cost of his trial, court-appointed counsel or counsel of his own choosing, was ordered, in particular, to pay costs amounting

recall to prison on revocation of his licence.

    The applicant lodged several complaints about the excessive length of the proceedings before the Regional Court concerning his appeal against the decision recalculating the amount of his

for the assessment of his application, as there was a risk of his absconding.

appeal and to overrule his conviction (see paragraph 34 of the judgment).

a search based on his first name and surname.” 28 .

Had such compensation been awarded within a reasonable time-frame, he would have been able to recover his losses and to start his business operations again. 40.

this request by the court, i.e. the defects of his application that had to be corrected, thus assisting him – an old disabled man who had no legal assistance – in the implementation of his right to court

This would have reduced his income tax liability by GBP 195. 12.

contrary to Article 3 of the Convention in his country of origin.

COMPLAINT The applicant complained that there had been a breach of Article 7 of the Convention resulting from his release at the two thirds point of his sentence on licence.

IU-2) to be appointed as his representative. 41.

The applicant accepted his nomination and informed the Electoral Commission of the Yaroslavl Region thereof on 23 July 2013. He also informed it of his personal details, including his nationalities.