The   proceedings were instituted under file no. 5 F 272/98. At approximately the same time custody proceedings were opened before the same court under file no. 5 F 283/98.

Lists of lay judges for district courts were compiled by local authorities and were validated by the regional legislature (section 2).

    On 15 July 2013 three security guards of SIZO-3 who were present during the applicant’s release were questioned after being cautioned about criminal liability for perjury.

Some key witnesses were questioned much later and the confrontations between them and the police officers were held even later or not at all.

  4 and 5 were allowed to use the toilet located outside the cells three times a day. In cells nos.   4 and 5 there were no individual beds.

    The Russian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.

    The Committee notes with concern that, according to the State party’s report (CERD/C/KGZ/5-7, para. 12) and other reports, Uzbeks were the main victims of the June 2010 events but were also

The Lithuanian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms E.   Baltutytė. 3.

The Italian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms E. Spatafora. 3.

He claimed that the trial court had ignored the hospital’s expert opinion that there were no grounds requiring the applicant’s further confinement.

    The applicants were represented by Mr C. Mécary, a lawyer practising in Paris. The French Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs E.

They were both represented before the Court by Mr   I. Milanović, an advocate practising in Umag, Croatia. 2.

Such contact, and knowledge of his own origins, were in the child’s best interest.

However, the factual circumstances of that case were different, as it related to a specific event of alleged rape involving two persons.

In particular, the Government noted that there was an inconsistency as to the date the applicant’s complaints were lodged with the domestic authorities, because there were variations in the dates indicated

Nor had he demonstrated that those expenses were reasonable. 70.

The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs Š. Stažnik. 3.

The applicants were represented by Mr A. Salerni, a lawyer practising in Rome.

New criminal proceedings were instituted in respect of forgery committed by an official of the company, which were joined to the original proceedings. 12.