CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

3 636 résultats pour « Liztler »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-127198

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2013

17 septembre 2013

Bearing in mind the lack of information given to the said applicants about the Government’s plans in their respect and the conditions they were kept in for eight hours on the bus, allegedly with little

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0724JUD004854599

Admin. suprême

24 juillet 2007

24 juillet 2007

It considers that, in these circumstances, an objection against such stereotyped reasoning would have had little prospect of success before another instance.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1119DEC003293910

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2013

19 novembre 2013

  Each case was to be judged on its own facts, but it was possible now to provide a little more detail at least about those who fell within the ‘political profile’ sub-category.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2482645-2696229

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2008

23 septembre 2008

12 years and four months, of the applicant’s detention on remand, and a violation of Article   5 §   4 as any existing remedy at that time to challenge the lawfulness of that detention had little

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0322DEC006793001

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2005

22 mars 2005

Noting that the applicants in general had provided very little information, the court found it difficult to understand why, for instance, the first applicant had refused to name the person at whose home

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0409DEC003278896

Admin. suprême

9 avril 1997

9 avril 1997

and in consequence prejudiced and unable to make a fair judgment;   (d)   that the applicant was not given full proper advance notice of the matters being raised against him and was given little

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0926DEC003765797

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2000

26 septembre 2000

The Government note that the applicant has produced little information to substantiate his claim of loss of business.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD006593711

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2017

17 janvier 2017

In this respect the Court reiterates that there is little scope under Article 10 § 2 of the Convention for restrictions on freedom of expression when a matter of public interest is at stake (see Couderc

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1129DEC002537394

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 1995

29 novembre 1995

       The procedure in Scotland for enforcing payment of the community charge was apparently designed with a view to leaving as little scope for dispute as possible.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0114DEC002903595

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 1998

14 janvier 1998

The applicant's appeal was pending for a little more than one year, whereas the Supreme Court refused leave to appeal within two months.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1022DEC003236896

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 1997

22 octobre 1997

had been served in accordance with the requirements of Article 588 para. 1 (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Wetboek van Strafvordering) and that a request for revision would, therefore, stand little

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504DEC003684497

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2000

4 mai 2000

  While the first applicant's replies to the charges had said little more than the bare minimum, the High Court did not find it established from where he had received the drugs or what role he had

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1028JUD004760310

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 2014

28 octobre 2014

Even at the occupancy rate put forward by the Government, the applicant’s living space during the periods he spent there seems to have regularly been below 4 sq. m and was sometimes as little as 1.45 sq

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0601JUD004188709

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2017

1 juin 2017

The Court found, in addition, that the domestic courts had applied a formalistic approach and had left a governmental agency full and uncontrolled discretion to certify, with reference to little more than

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006DEC003575706

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2009

6 octobre 2009

He considered that judicial review, with the preliminary filter of the need for leave and little prospect of obtaining an order for cross-examination of witnesses, was hardly a satisfactory substitute

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502JUD001476909

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2017

2 mai 2017

Although he was not formally recognised as a suspect, the material before the Court leaves little doubt in respect of his actual status as a person arrested on suspicion of having committed a criminal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-157306

Admin. suprême

25 août 2015

25 août 2015

The Koper District Court rejected the applicant’s request, stating that while the police search of his mobile telephone without a court order violated his right to communication privacy, it had little

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1108JUD001023102

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2005

8 novembre 2005

It considers therefore that the Government’s submission on the inheritance question has little relevance to the proceedings before the Court and must be rejected (see paragraph 26 above). B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0626JUD002686403

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2008

26 juin 2008

failure of the authorities, following years of investigation, to produce to the court a case ready for trial or to drop the charges against the applicant in compliance with applicable law, reveals little

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0706DEC001295787

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 1989

6 juillet 1989

  After having deliberated the Court expressed the view that the applicant's case had very little prospects of success.

Source officielle

Page 96 sur 182

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.