CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-192740
28 mars 2019
stage pursuant to Law no. 3842 and the subsequent use by the trial court of the statements taken in the absence of a lawyer (see Salduz v.
Page 96 sur 1635
ECLI:CEDH:001-234287
17 mai 2024
the dates of the trial.
ECLI:CEDH:001-152674
5 février 2015
It found that the trial court had correctly established the facts of the case on the basis of M.M., Sa.L. and St.
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2232948-2378941
8 janvier 2008
It was also stated that the trial judge had given the jury explicit directions on how to treat the statement in question. Further leave to appeal was refused.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1202DEC001980492
2 décembre 1992
state with the trial judge.
ECLI:CEDH:001-111731
21 mai 2012
at the trial stage.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0323DEC001514103
23 mars 2004
Therefore, they cannot justify release from pre-trial detention.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11189
13 septembre 2016
In his ensuing interviews, he consistently referred to his written statement, which was admitted as evidence at his trial.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0527JUD002179003
27 mai 2010
The applicant contested the Government's argument, arguing that the trial judge had had the principal responsibility for the conduct of the trial. 34.
1ère Chambre
DTA_2400048_20250127
27 janvier 2025
Elle soutient que : - elle a pris un abonnement mensuel de transport de 90 euros auprès du service des Vedettes Tropicales, qui assure une liaison en navettes maritimes entre son domicile, situé aux
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0626DEC003277196
26 juin 2001
trial proceedings and appreciate the consequences of his plea of guilty.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1006JUD007643812
6 octobre 2016
The reasons given by the trial and appeal courts had been exhaustive and sufficient.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0509JUD003665805
9 mai 2017
The applicant’s testimony during the trial 18 . At the trial the applicant pleaded not guilty to the charges against her.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0428JUD003600106
28 avril 2015
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable
ECLI:CEDH:002-11368
At the trial hearing the incriminating report was discussed by the applicant’s expert, who defended his own findings.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0207JUD004701706
7 février 2017
Mr Marov also alleged a violation of the fair trial guarantees, referring to findings made in separate proceedings and the use of those findings in his trial.
ECLI:CEDH:002-11676
As regards the two attesting witnesses, the overall fairness of the trial had not been prejudiced and the applicant had been able to effectively present her case and the arguments in her defence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1114JUD004817318
14 novembre 2023
Parties may ask questions on the report for clarification before the matter comes to trial. 77.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0301JUD003204311
1 mars 2022
While it is true that the third applicant did not ask the trial court to hear S.T. in person, this failure cannot be held against him, given that the trial court, in requesting copies of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1211JUD000720312
11 décembre 2018
The trial court dismissed the application.