He also claims that he was denied the right to an effective remedy in respect of the alleged violation of Article 3 of the Convention because he was not granted public legal counsel and because

hearing and because it did not hear anew the witnesses and he did not have the possibility to put questions to witnesses. 10.

He emphasised that in 2004 he had been separated from his children not because of his fault but because of circumstances that were beyond his control – the death of his former wife and the particularly

    By a letter of 15 April 1993 the first applicant and her husband wrote to J.P. asking him to move out because they intended to return to the flat.

In their decisions the courts persistently held that the applicant's continued detention was lawful and justified because she was charged with a serious criminal offence and because there were no circumstances

because the victims did not attend and one hearing was adjourned because it was necessary to serve a co-defendant with a copy of the indictment bill in a language he understood.

He was also granted a disability pension; however, the payment of that pension was suspended because the amount of the old-age pension was higher.

The project, which would involve the use of cyanide, was controversial because of its estimated negative impact on the environment and the local heritage.

Varyan because he was slow and naïve. Servicemen called him names, swore at him and took advantage of him because of his naivety, including by making him do the cleaning even if he was not on duty.

    If a defendant fails to appear in court because he was not duly notified of the time and place, the court shall adjourn the hearing.

It also awarded the applicant the costs incurred in serving the official notice because they had resulted from the actions of the company and the agency. 15.

They pointed out that the boy, who was two months old, had been admitted to the hospital because he was emaciated.

The decision of 12 May 2003 was not appealed against and it became final on 22 May 2003. B.

He then asked for a further adjournment because he was taken up with another hearing in a different case before another President of the District Court of Limassol.

conflict between E. and herself and not because of her mental disorder, so the disorder did not make her a danger to others.

After her husband’s death in 1989 the applicant became the sole holder of the specially protected tenancy.

On 29   July   1998 this decision became final. 25.

Because the materials of the criminal case allow to assume that objects important for the said criminal case are located at [the applicant’s home], I order the following: 1.

    It is also not a technicality if the jury decided that he was not in control of the articles because that is a decision on the facts, because the other part of that limb is that there is