The applicant had not been a victim of the alleged violation, because the judgments had been not in his favour but in favour of Saturn.

However, the judgment in the applicant’s favour was never executed.

Later in 1997 the Martin District Court ( Okresný súd ) issued a payment order ( platobný rozkaz ) in the applicant company's favour in summary proceedings and the order was subsequently quashed on the

application was lodged before the European Court of Human Rights on 27   September   2004; on 1   December 2009 the Chamber to which the case had been assigned relinquished jurisdiction in favour

    The applicant alleged, in particular, a violation of Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in that the judgment in his favour had not been enforced in good time. 4.

On 21 June 1999 the Chişinău Economic Court found in favour of CALBOR and awarded it MDL 1,877,212 (154,918 euros (EUR) at the time).

On 25 September 2008 the Chamber to which the cases had been allocated relinquished jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber under Article 30 [2] of the Convention.

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 26 juillet 2024, la société ABP Infini, représentée par Me Favot, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler le titre exécutoire n° 151932 émis

poursuites et diligences de ses représentants légaux domiciliés en cette qualité audit siège immatriculée au RCS de PARIS sous le numéro 820 586 741 [Adresse 2] [Adresse 2] représentée par Me Benoît FAVOT

of Z.O. prior to and during election day (in the form of openly campaigning in his favour and coercing voters to vote for him); (ii)     Z.O.'

He submitted that the judgments in his favour had not been enforced. He further claimed that the Government had not offered compensation for the loss of the value of the judgments' debts. 21.

The court also found that the applicant had sustained moral damage as the result of the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment in his favour.

    Decisions in the applicants’ favour against the State unitary enterprise 4.

    Decisions in the applicants’ favour against the debtor company 10.

    On 16   April   2002 I.B., based on the occupancy order issued in his favour, registered himself as a resident in Flat B.

As a result, the court makes no award of costs in favour of the defendant.” 7.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE CONVENTION AND ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 ON ACCOUNT OF THE QUASHING OF THE JUDGMENT IN THE APPLICANT'S FAVOUR 10.

    First decision in the applicant's favour 5.

    The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.1 about the quashing of the judgment in his favour on 30 September 2005.

  1 on account of the State’s failure to enforce the final judgments in the applicants’ favour in good time.