which date they were destroyed. 70.

The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. 3.

The facilities were equipped with medicines and medical equipment according to established norms.

Moreover, the relevant Danish forces had no knowledge of the prison in question; they were not aware that some of the Iraqi detainees would be transferred thereto and they had no concrete and real information

    The Government maintained that the proceedings were being held before three levels of jurisdiction and that they were very complex.

    On 20 September 2013 new charges were brought against the applicant.

The remaining four defendants were sentenced to imprisonment ranging from one year and six months to two years and six months, but their sentences were suspended and they were placed on probation for two

The Government also pointed out that the internal rules of the school that the applicant had attended were very specific on these points. 36.

The Lithuanian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms E.   Baltutytė. 3.

He submitted that the accusations against him were unfounded.

theoretical or illusory, but rights that were practical and effective (the applicant referred to Artico v.

The couple was tied up and forced to reveal the hiding place of the safe from which around DEM 1,600,000 or 1,800,000 were taken.

Superwood’s detailed appeal submissions were lodged in July 1993. Following two further adjournments, the insurer’s appeal submissions were lodged in January 1994.

Both sets of proceedings were unsuccessful, and the applicant did not pursue them after 2001.

He further contended that the conditions of his detention were inhuman and degrading.

    The applicants were represented by Ms G. Stoyanova, a lawyer practising in Sofia. The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agents, Ms S. Atanasova and Ms M.

It has encroached on the rights of the person they were representing before the court ... and has led to unjustifiable delays in the examination of the merits of the case.

purposes of the planned undercover operations, and the operations were not subjected to judicial review or any other independent supervision.

    The applicants were represented by Mr N. Runevski, a lawyer practising in Sofia. The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agents, Mrs M. Dimova and Mrs S.