Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-114349
12 octobre 2012
12 octobre 2012
The trial court held that the applicant’s guilt in relation to the impugned crimes had been proven by an extensive body of evidence examined during the trial, such as the records of the applicant’s questionings
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1112DEC001816012
12 novembre 2019
12 novembre 2019
within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214DEC007158517
14 décembre 2021
14 décembre 2021
As the second lawyer did not accept his appointment, eight days before the trial the trial court provided the applicant with a legal aid lawyer.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1213DEC004508719
13 décembre 2022
13 décembre 2022
During both the pre-trial and trial stages the domestic courts examined at regular intervals (once every six months at most) whether the applicants’ pre-trial detention continued to be justified
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229258
2 novembre 2023
2 novembre 2023
in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant in the 2018
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0212DEC001445388
12 février 1990
12 février 1990
The hearings of this trial were held on 5, 7, 11, 13, 15, 19 and 21 May 1987.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229914
30 novembre 2023
30 novembre 2023
in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based, Art. 6
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504DEC004625399
4 mai 2000
4 mai 2000
At the beginning of his trial in the Tribunal de Corts the applicant complained that the trial was being held in the absence of J.M.R. and requested a stay of proceedings.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0329DEC000353310
29 mars 2022
29 mars 2022
The applicant did not comment on the Government’s preliminary objections, but complained that his right to a fair trial had been breached owing to the trial court’s use of evidence obtained
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126497
30 août 2013
30 août 2013
The court held that the applicant should remain in detention and that the trial should be closed to the public for “ensuring the security of the persons participating in the trial”.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177409
7 septembre 2017
7 septembre 2017
On 15 December 2010 the applicant lodged an appeal against the trial court’s judgment.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1202DEC001807791
2 décembre 1992
2 décembre 1992
of the trial, considering the expense involved to be unacceptable.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0511DEC004406298
11 mai 2000
11 mai 2000
after the commencement of the trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1206JUD001984215
6 décembre 2018
6 décembre 2018
within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0323DEC001342502
23 mars 2004
23 mars 2004
the trial court.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206000
16 octobre 2020
16 octobre 2020
Personal situation of the applicants (a) The applicants’ arrests and pre-trial detention 12.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1123DEC002169806
23 novembre 2010
23 novembre 2010
admissible as evidence in his own trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0309DEC001155385
9 mars 1987
9 mars 1987
trials on indictment in the Crown Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-169388
8 novembre 2016
8 novembre 2016
The application concerns the speediness of the periodic judicial review of the applicant’s pre-trial detention by the Frankfurt/Main Court of Appeal and, linked thereto, the lawfulness of the detention
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-192732
28 mars 2019
28 mars 2019
Did the applicants have a fair trial within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?
Source officiellePage 98 sur 1635