Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)

    A different concept of national legislation, which would provide minority shareholders with an unrestricted right to challenge a majority shareholder’s decision before a court, could result

    The Court reiterates that the execution of a judgment given by any court must be regarded as an integral part of a “hearing” for the purposes of Article   6.

If the court summons could not be served on a recipient at the first attempt the summons shall be sent at least one more time to the same address or any other address known to the court. ... 7.

    The Court reiterates that the execution of a judgment given by any court must be regarded as an integral part of a “hearing” for the purposes of Article   6.

could be regarded as excessively formalistic. 9.

judge at the same court. 3.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)

The Court is not convinced by this argument.

, the courts of cassation could not examine his appeal against that decision. 19.

It further held that the applicant could bring such a claim before the civil courts.

    The Court reiterates that civil servants can only be excluded from the protection embodied in Article 6 if the State in its national law excluded access to a court for the category of staff

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)

The court stated that it could not proceed with the disciplinary proceedings, as the applicant was no longer a member of the military.

Under this procedure, the applicant could have complained that the bailiff had refused to carry out the enforcement, and the courts could have ordered the bailiff to do so.

    The Court of Appeal dismissed the applicants’ argument that they could not contest the measure before the County Court because they lacked standing in the criminal proceedings, on the ground

Court, have asked the first-instance court to duly serve the enforcement order on her, so that she could appeal against it...” 15.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)

On the day of the hearing the applicant company, present in court through its director, informed the Court of Appeal that it could pay the deposit on the spot.